Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Автор обсуждения пометил сообщение как ответ на свой вопрос.
Правила обсуждений
568 
Пожаловаться
On another subject. I watched the other day M:I Dead Reckoning. And I found it... bland. It felt to me as an overextended movie. As in they really didn't have script for two movies but 'hey everybody is doing a two-parter so we're doing it too'.
Action sets weren't that 'catchy' (maybe the best part was the car chase) and lasted for too long. It didn't felt the movie had a 'villain', just a henchman (The 'I've foreseen all outcomes and know exactly how everything is going to happen' was kind of already done with Solomon Lane not that long ago) The final set piece on the train (again) felt too long and no-stakes.
I'll just say I'm more looking forward to the second part of Fast & Furious X than I am for Dead Reckoning II
I'm not a fan either of movies going into the direction of everything being a "multi-part experience".. I get it from a standpoint that a movie might otherwise be a bit too long but still, i'd take that over multi-part movies any day of the week.. Especially when i watch movies at home for free, i don't even remember the last time when i went to the cinema for a movie..
I get what you're saying but the major difference between those movies and movies nowadays is that stuff like harry potter/lord of the rings was actually good.. These days a lot of stuff is just stale/mid or downright unintersting to me..
Because hollywood never learns, they are convinced that the bigger the budget they throw at it the better a movie does.. Which it obviously doesn't, especially if the writing of said movie is completely on the wall..
One of the biggest reasons why movies fail is terrible writing, but also those 2/3 minute trailers that literally show the entire movie itself.. If you want to excite people, then perhaps stop showing the entire premise of said movie with 1 single trailer or even teasers..
Another thing that ruins movies is modern day politics, that some activist writer completely changes the source material because they think that they are superior over the source material.. Or how stuff needs to be toned down to please these same people, otherwise they're going to sit there and cry on twitter about "We must cancel these people, they are RACISTS!!!!"
It's so unbelievable tiresome..
That's indeed been a thing for a while now, hence why Amy Schumer for example is still allowed to do her awful comedy shows
All in the family, Archie Bunker wasn't portrayed positively. But getting kissed by Sammy Davis Jr was hilarious.
The Jefferson's, George Jefferson was a racist. His saving grace was to save a Klansman when he didn't have to save him
I grew up a bit on “All in the Family”, yeah; I remember that bit of him getting kissed. But I also remembered him standing up for a black maid and rebuking the Klan in separate incidents.