Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文（簡体字中国語）
繁體中文（繁体字中国語）
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština（チェコ語）
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia（インドネシア語）
Magyar（ハンガリー語）
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português（ポルトガル語－ポルトガル）
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română（ルーマニア語）
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
このトピックはロックされています 
ルールとガイドライン
この投稿を報告する
Please read carefully. I've said
what microtransactions?
dang I just seen that, I not been playing since I got my champion kart.
I expect nothing less from activision though.
Imo, this is a great thing, because that'll support future Grand Prix events. People that want to pay for getting some extra Wumpa Coins will support future events. Making new tracks, skins, characters and different victory animations for each skin demands money, and just selling the base game will not support this event forever. With these microtransactions, the GP can last way longer and keep attracting more players. It might be good for the online game, developers and players.
But yeah, I agree that Activision indeed lied about the microtransactions. They should've warned us about that since the annoucement of the game.
So, you can still buy the PC version. You won't be supporting the microtransactions, but the game in itself. One thing doesn't necessarily leads to the other.
Buying the game supports the company, which is what I'm against, microtransactions and all. Not buying the microtransactions doesn't matter if the game sells well, since it just gives them more reasons to put them there. It sucks, as there are developers I'd love to support, but the publisher they're owned by makes me not want to spend my money on their games.
It'll only get worse from here, unless we simply stop buying Activision products altogether, then maybe, just maybe they'll get the message. Doubt it though, since the CEO has been quoted as saying he wanted to turn game development into essentially a packaged product sort of thing, and milk players as much as possible.
This video pretty much sums up everything, and all the reasons I'm not willing to support companies like Activision at this stage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZCjz756Oy0
- If someone wants to spend their money with "virtual coins", that's not necessarily a problem. An individual needs to know what is better for himself. If that means to spend money because they can't control themselves, that's not my problem, it's an individual problem that he needs to know how to deal with. They need to learn how to spend their money, but not forced to do it. Activision is not forcing anyone to use microtransactions, neither the players are forced to buy these virtual coins to win in the game, it's simply some cosmetic stuff. I don't see a problem at all with that. Activision is just implementing a new system, that's all... Anyone is losing with that.
- Supporting the company doesn't mean supporting the microtransactions. That was my point since my first answer to you. You can buy the game, support new games from the same franchise (and from other franchises too), but be against the microtransactions system. How do you do that? Well, don't use it. It might discourage Activision to keep implementing this kind of system into new games. That called a "boycott".
I really don't understand how one thing relates to the other one. You can agree with the franchises, support other games from Activision, but can be specifically against the microtransactions. You're not seeing how to separate both things, at least that's what I'm noticing through your comments.
I'll watch this video later, btw.
I do agree that if someone spends a lot of money on microtransactions, that is a personal problem, the issue I take with companies implementing them is that said problems are what they want to take advantage of, and make worse, to make money from people with them. It's not a life threatening thing, but it's scummy as hell nonetheless. I don't have major issues with cosmetic only microtransactions, in most cases, it's more the lying and disrespect in this specific case.
I do kinda agree, but I'd rather simply not support the company than support them and not spend money on the microtransactions. I can see how an inability to separate them would come across, but that's not how I intended it. Separating them is easy, they're just one part of many things companies like Activision do that I refuse to support, so they just add to the bigger picture of it, or do in this case at least.
The video is a good watch to be honest. A lot of stuff I personally wasn't aware of until after watching it that has me unwilling to give EA or Activision a single cent until they pull their heads out of their arses. Sure, I'm only one person, but every little bit helps I guess. XD
They are separate things, but it’s more about supporting the company than the game itself, which is what I meant more than anything, though I can see how my wording wasn’t too clear.