Windows XP is the best OS?

[Pr.Jitterskull - best bug fixer]

Most tech still running on it to this day. Even modern tech is made specifically to the Windows XP. It's still quite popular OS in many countries as well. Not to mention a lot of people are still making new updates to it despite it being abandoned by Microsoft and "no longer supported" by them.

But I'd say Windows 7 is good too.

[F B I]

win10 no1

[RRW359]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

I didn't say 7 was better either. If you are so confidant that all 10 games are better, maybe you should enlighten me and say which of the 7 games you hated so much.

I haven't played any of them so I can't give an unbiased review of them, I don't even own them, again you have failed to point out the advantages that the actual OS 7 has over using 10, I like how people who trash talk 10 avoid this

Wheather I think 7 or 10 is better, it ultimately hurts your cause if you pull something out of nowhere and say it's true without evidance. You just said you haven't played any of them, so how can you claim the exclusives to one OS are better than thegames that don't work on them? It's just like how you assumed I "trash-talked" 10 when I never did.

[Alliesaurus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

I haven't played any of them so I can't give an unbiased review of them, I don't even own them, again you have failed to point out the advantages that the actual OS 7 has over using 10, I like how people who trash talk 10 avoid this

Wheather I think 7 or 10 is better, it ultimately hurts your cause if you pull something out of nowhere and say it's true without evidance. You just said you haven't played any of them, so how can you claim the exclusives to one OS are better than thegames that don't work on them? It's just like how you assumed I "trash-talked" 10 when I never did.

I have to play them to know they are better, the fact that 10 has it's own good quality exclusives is better than old games that don't work on 10 but do on 7, they have a higher game rating for one, not to mention a large player base and fan base, some more exlusives to 10 for example ReCore, Gears of War, Halo Wars 2, Crackdown, Killer Instinct, Gears of War: Ultimate Edition, I didn't say you trash talked 10 specifically, just that those that do tend to overlook the actual advantages in security, stability and other upgrades 10 has over 7

[Xero_Daxter]

Windows 10 grew on me.

[RRW359]

That's a

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

Wheather I think 7 or 10 is better, it ultimately hurts your cause if you pull something out of nowhere and say it's true without evidance. You just said you haven't played any of them, so how can you claim the exclusives to one OS are better than thegames that don't work on them? It's just like how you assumed I "trash-talked" 10 when I never did.

I have to play them to know they are better, the fact that 10 has it's own good quality exclusives is better than old games that don't work on 10 but do on 7, they have a higher game rating for one, not to mention a large player base and fan base, some more exlusives to 10 for example ReCore, Gears of War, Halo Wars 2, Crackdown, Killer Instinct, Gears of War: Ultimate Edition, I didn't say you trash talked 10 specifically, just that those that do tend to overlook the actual advantages in security, stability and other upgrades 10 has over 7

That's assuming newer games are by default better than older ones. I'm also guessing you never looked up if any older games still had good reviews.

[Alliesaurus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

That's a

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

I have to play them to know they are better, the fact that 10 has it's own good quality exclusives is better than old games that don't work on 10 but do on 7, they have a higher game rating for one, not to mention a large player base and fan base, some more exlusives to 10 for example ReCore, Gears of War, Halo Wars 2, Crackdown, Killer Instinct, Gears of War: Ultimate Edition, I didn't say you trash talked 10 specifically, just that those that do tend to overlook the actual advantages in security, stability and other upgrades 10 has over 7

That's assuming newer games are by default better than older ones. I'm also guessing you never looked up if any older games still had good reviews.

If you want to give examples of better games that don't work 10 but do on 7 than the list of exclusives I've given then feel free, you could list the advantages of using a more vulnerable os to 10 too

[RRW359]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

That's a
That's assuming newer games are by default better than older ones. I'm also guessing you never looked up if any older games still had good reviews.

If you want to give examples of better games that don't work 10 but do on 7 than the list of exclusives I've given then feel free, you could list the advantages of using a more vulnerable os to 10 too

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, not the person who is skeptical of it.

[Alliesaurus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

If you want to give examples of better games that don't work 10 but do on 7 than the list of exclusives I've given then feel free, you could list the advantages of using a more vulnerable os to 10 too

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, not the person who is skeptical of it.

I've given my proof on exclusives on 10 and that telemetry is on 7,8 and 10 and can be disabled if the need is crucial, I've given proof for every point I have made yet no 7 user has given me any proof that 7 being the more vulnerable and less stable os is better than 10, until that happens I will remain subbed to this thread, while streaming some dark souls, in the hope that someone will make an actual valid point for 7

[whatamidoing]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย RRW359:

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, not the person who is skeptical of it.

I've given my proof on exclusives on 10 and that telemetry is on 7,8 and 10 and can be disabled if the need is crucial, I've given proof for every point I have made yet no 7 user has given me any proof that 7 being the more vulnerable and less stable os is better than 10, until that happens I will remain subbed to this thread, while streaming some dark souls, in the hope that someone will make an actual valid point for 7

We're asking why we should upgrade, and you haven't proved anything.

[Alliesaurus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย whatamidoing:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

I've given my proof on exclusives on 10 and that telemetry is on 7,8 and 10 and can be disabled if the need is crucial, I've given proof for every point I have made yet no 7 user has given me any proof that 7 being the more vulnerable and less stable os is better than 10, until that happens I will remain subbed to this thread, while streaming some dark souls, in the hope that someone will make an actual valid point for 7

We're asking why we should upgrade, and you haven't proved anything.

I have given links in previous posts that have been proof to points I have made, it's not upto me to convince anyone to upgrade, at no point did anyone ask me why they should upgrade, this is another example of slightly changing a question to make proof of other points invalid, but yeah at no point did anyone ask why they should upgrade, everyone was just saying 7 was better, and I gave proof that's just not true

[whatamidoing]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย whatamidoing:

We're asking why we should upgrade, and you haven't proved anything.

I have given links in previous posts that have been proof to points I have made, it's not upto me to convince anyone to upgrade, at no point did anyone ask me why they should upgrade, this is another example of slightly changing a questing to make proof of other points invalid

The burden of proof is on you, it'd be quite easy to infer that the people who are arguing 7 > 10 are still on 7 and not 10 because upgrading hasn't been demonstrated to be worth it. So there's questionable exclusives, telemetry and the other data collection you always forget about that can be turned off but will reenable itself, and a whole bunch of other legitimate complaints that you blanket-label "excuses" and refuse to address. Not a solid argument.

[Alliesaurus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย whatamidoing:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

I have given links in previous posts that have been proof to points I have made, it's not upto me to convince anyone to upgrade, at no point did anyone ask me why they should upgrade, this is another example of slightly changing a questing to make proof of other points invalid

The burden of proof is on you, it'd be quite easy to infer that the people who are arguing 7 > 10 are still on 7 and not 10 because upgrading hasn't been demonstrated to be worth it. So there's questionable exclusives, telemetry and the other data collection you always forget about that can be turned off but will reenable itself, and a whole bunch of other legitimate complaints that you blanket-label "excuses" and refuse to address. Not a solid argument.

If you think using a more vulnerable and less stable os is more beneficial than upgrading to an os that's less vulnerable and more stable isn't worth the free upgrade that's upto you, the fact that 10 is a more advantageous os and that these limited complaints stop people from upgrading is just excuses people use to defend not upgrading, there is no advantage using 7 over 10 at all, but there are advantages of using 10 over 7

[whatamidoing]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย whatamidoing:

The burden of proof is on you, it'd be quite easy to infer that the people who are arguing 7 > 10 are still on 7 and not 10 because upgrading hasn't been demonstrated to be worth it. So there's questionable exclusives, telemetry and the other data collection you always forget about that can be turned off but will reenable itself, and a whole bunch of other legitimate complaints that you blanket-label "excuses" and refuse to address. Not a solid argument.

If you think using a more vulnerable and less stable os is more beneficial than upgrading to an os that's less vulnerable and more stable isn't worth the free upgrade that's upto you, the fact that 10 is a more advantageous os and that these limited complaints stop people from upgrading is just excuses people use to defend not upgrading, there is no advantage using 7 over 10 at all, but there are advantages of using 10 over 7

1. proofs? 7 is perfectly stable for me, and basic common sense has meant I've never had any security issues, even when downloading exe files from questionable websites. MBAM never turns up anything when I can be bothered to run it.

2. It hasn't been free for a while, and 10 was definitely worse on the spying and instability when it was free to upgrade, also the forced updates.

[Alliesaurus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย whatamidoing:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

If you think using a more vulnerable and less stable os is more beneficial than upgrading to an os that's less vulnerable and more stable isn't worth the free upgrade that's upto you, the fact that 10 is a more advantageous os and that these limited complaints stop people from upgrading is just excuses people use to defend not upgrading, there is no advantage using 7 over 10 at all, but there are advantages of using 10 over 7

1. proofs? 7 is perfectly stable for me, and basic common sense has meant I've never had any security issues, even when downloading exe files from questionable websites. MBAM never turns up anything when I can be bothered to run it.

2. It hasn't been free for a while, and 10 was definitely worse on the spying and instability when it was free to upgrade, also the forced updates.

There is literally no reason when using 10 not to update so forced updates isn't an issue, and 10s updater is more stable than 7s was, and the "spying" everyone refers to is harmless, it is literally incorporated into anything that is connected to the Internet now, and you can just switch it off so that's Windows 7 user complaints pretty much cleared up, and for your statement that 7 being more stable than 10 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.techadvisor.co.uk/review/operating-systems-software/windows-7-vs-window-10-comparison-review-3617974/%3famp

[whatamidoing]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ne0n Ri0:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย whatamidoing:

1. proofs? 7 is perfectly stable for me, and basic common sense has meant I've never had any security issues, even when downloading exe files from questionable websites. MBAM never turns up anything when I can be bothered to run it.

2. It hasn't been free for a while, and 10 was definitely worse on the spying and instability when it was free to upgrade, also the forced updates.

There is literally no reason when using 10 not to update so forced updates isn't an issue, and 10s updater is more stable than 7s was, and the "spying" everyone refers to is harmless, it is literally incorporated into anything that is connected to the Internet now, and you can just switch it off so that's Windows 7 user complaints pretty much cleared up

How about to avoid all the additional telemetry updates, and how about when windows decides it's time to update right when you're working on a long task such as rendering a video, as in the famous video of a guy raging at it, or how about when it's an update that breaks your system? Again, I've not had any problem updating when I want on 7, and the updater seems perfectly stable. And now you're defending the spying by calling it "harmless", which is an attitude I entirely disagree with since I do value any scrap of privacy I can scrounge up. And you can still go back to the part where I listed my other complaints that you're still refusing to address.

https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/10/09/microsoft-hits-the-brakes-on-latest-windows-10-update-what-to-do/