Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
It's more about genre and storytelling elements. If he opposes a superhero, he's probably a supervillain. Unless he's a joke villain.
Hero and villain are more or less interchangeable with protagonist and antagonist. Not always, but it's a decent enough rule of thumb. Meanwhile, superheroes and supervillains are in some way beyond your standard heroes and villains. Sure, one way they can be so is by being super strong, super fast, etc, like Superman/Doomsday, but also they can be super smart, like Batman/Lex Luthor, or super techy, like Cyborg/Brainiac.
Which means regular villains are more interesting.
Nazi Regime was a villain in 1933, but became a Super Villain in 1940.
Bolsheviks was a villain in 1917, became a Super Villain under Stalin's rule.
Covid-19 was a villain in 2019, but became a Super Villain in 2020.
Mao's Regime was a villain in 1948.
I wish I could award you but I'm poor as hll
The difference is one is super.