Why they didnt use guns in Harry potter last two movies?

[Samwise]

They could had used mind controlling spells on some soldiers, take them to the wizard world and mask them as wizards. Theres not even one wizard who is fast enough to cast shielding spell against bullets.

Hell, they could had used some control spells for guns, so they could compensate for the lack of accuracy.

[Radene]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Samwise:

Of course not. They'd be useless.

Against death eaters? Wanna explain? [/quote]

Against anything and anyone. But especially against plot devices. Muggles can't do jack about those.

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

Because Rowling is a writer not NRA lobbyist.

[mari]

pretty sure they have a spell for that. maybe protego? I mean, they can already blow people up with reducto/bombarda and cut people with diffindo, why would they need a far heavier and far less versatile metal cannon?

[Samwise]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από screw you admin:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Samwise:

Take out the ministry. Bunch of cucks anyway.

But he couldn't repel Voldemort's spell with a gun

Hide behind walls
Levitate spells
Profit

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Radene:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Samwise:

Of course not. They'd be useless.

Against death eaters? Wanna explain?

Against anything and anyone. But especially against plot devices. Muggles can't do jack about those. [/quote]

I have seen many situation in those movies where gun would had instantly solve a problem. Havent seen anything that would make me believe gun wouldnt work.

[Samwise]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Rumpelcrutchskin:

Because Rowling is a writer not NRA lobbyist.

She sure left quite big question unanswered. Makes me wonder how she didnt thought about gun issue at all.

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από mari is sick:

pretty sure they have a spell for that. maybe protego? I mean, they can already blow people up with reducto/bombarda and cut people with diffindo, why would they need a far heavier and far less versatile metal cannon?

Speed. If you already aim at someone, they wont be even finishing the spell, let alone moving their wand before they drop on ground

[𝕎𝔸𝕃𝕋𝔼ℝ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Samwise:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Rumpelcrutchskin:

Because Rowling is a writer not NRA lobbyist.

She sure left quite big question unanswered. Makes me wonder how she didnt thought about gun issue at all.

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από mari is sick:

pretty sure they have a spell for that. maybe protego? I mean, they can already blow people up with reducto/bombarda and cut people with diffindo, why would they need a far heavier and far less versatile metal cannon?

Speed. If you already aim at someone, they wont be even finishing the spell, let alone moving their wand before they drop on ground

Ok but you still cant kill voldie with a gun

[mari]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Samwise:

Speed. If you already aim at someone, they wont be even finishing the spell, let alone moving their wand before they drop on ground

accio gun?
non-verbal spells?

i really have no idea where you're getting all these assumptions that guns are so much more superior than magic.

[Samwise]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από mari is sick:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Samwise:

Speed. If you already aim at someone, they wont be even finishing the spell, let alone moving their wand before they drop on ground

accio gun?
non-verbal spells?

i really have no idea where you're getting all these assumptions that guns are so much more superior than magic.

Well, keep couple spare ones then, lol

Not superior, but as an option. Could have both, you know.

[𝕎𝔸𝕃𝕋𝔼ℝ]

cuz hogwarts wasnt an american school

[Samwise]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από screw you admin:

cuz hogwarts wasnt an american school

Haggis!!

[eram]

Kinda did
https://i.imgur.com/CluSOoH.jpg

[Radene]

No but really. If someone showed up at Hogwarts with a gun:

The Hufflepuffs would break out the hot cocoa and chocolate chip cookies because that person obviously just needs to unwind.

The Ravenclaws would research the exact firearm model to develop immediately effective countermeasures.

The Syltherins would confuse and humiliate the poor gunner until they'd start considering to shoot themselves instead.

The Gryffindors would... I don't know, be awarded 50675 points for no reason, like every damn time.

[𝕎𝔸𝕃𝕋𝔼ℝ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Radene:

The Gryffindors would... I don't know, be awarded 50675 points for no reason, like every damn time.

because albus and lily were in gryffindor so it was rigged

[Legostyle03]

They can prepare a defense spell ahead of time to deflect the bullets, as a gun only has one attack, while a wand has many different attacks.

[=CrimsoN=]

Probably the same reason why blasters can be deflected by lightsabers. I'm sure there is some sort of basic defense spell that just deflects or more likely absorbs bullets. Just isn't talked about in the books.

edit: I'm actually right, and it's seen in the movies and books:
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Shield_Charm
Also guns are recognized to exist in the Harry Potter universe, they are just so inferior that take away from the magical world that they are barely mentioned or seen: https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Gun