Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
The engineering aspect certainly entertains me. I had to watch a few presentations on rail guns for military applications. It was some pretty cool stuff
Call of Duty Goats 2
Therefore you're wrong.
M4 is the more efficient one, is it not? from what I recall hearing is the AK has more kickback and stopping power. Firing a M4 is so smooth. But I dont have anything to compare a M4 to so IDK. In real life I imagine accuracy >> anything else
SKS is a great carbine, just doesn't fit what a military needs in these days anymore.
Yes, I Identify as an SKS.
Nah, just the SKS gets so much crap when it does so many things better while being at a higher base quality level. You get an SKS that feeds out of a AK mag and bam. Better.
Military needs carbines for mobility. You dont want to get in and out of a vehicle with an extra foot on the length of your weapon while your getting shot at.
1. The original m16 was touted as self cleaning, which no rifle is, and wasn't designed to be.
2.There was a shortage of proper maintenance kits and cleaning manuals when soldiers got in country
3. Probably the most egregious offense was the US goverment using the wrong kind of propellant in the early ammo, again against the proper design of the rifle
These were the issues with the "black rifle" as it pertained to it's introduction. There really isn't anything in terms of reliability that won me over from the AK side.
As far as the SKS platform goes, I really don;t understand enough about it. I have shot one a few times but other than that I can't say much than what i know off the top of my head.
The AK is more versatile due to the select fire and certainly more iconic as a weapons platform than the SKS. You mentioned the internal box magazine... hooray for stripper clips? Not compared to a banana mag.
The ak mag is itself a monopod. particularly fitted with an optic firing prone form this doesn't have to be an issue.
You reference your personal experience and manufacturing tolerances - both of which can vary wildly. Do you have any accuracy data?
While china may have preferred the SKS, after their cultural revolution caved in, they weren't the ones supplying the majority of aid to north vietnam -the soviets were. who preferred the AK. The SKs was phased out almost immediately because the AK was lighter and had superior capacity as well as fire select.
China and vietnam are different regions too. The sks is somewhat of an early DMR, which worked well for the chinese, but in the dense jungles of vietnam, was outside of it's "comfort zone". It simply wasn't the bests tool for the job.