安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Markiplier was asking fans to vote on choices in a game or something by commenting green hearts or a red thing that looked like a Mario hat, and people started getting banned. Including people who pay for the membership stuff. I don't doubt that there was spam in the chat, but some of these people are dedicated fans of his.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWaz7ofl5wQ
EXACTLY. I have an email from my late mom on my Gmail account that's tied to my phone, and if my Google account got banned, I would lose that. Along with anything tied to Google, like Google Play and the apps owned by Google.
With no reason to improve, YouTube will continue to be that way, unfortunately.
Yes, but these people are getting accounts banned whether they broke any rules or not. One guy got his account banned, appealed it and won, then it was banned again 30 minutes later. People are paying YouTube for a membership, and even those people have gotten banned too.
Part of the reason is YouTube's automated stuff and their staff basically saying "there's nothing we can do" when that's absolutely not the case.
I wasn't watching the livestream and neither did I get banned off YT, I just happened to see the video in my notifications and watched it. And I thought it was important and interesting to talk about, given the severity of that situation. I come across some videos like that from time to time of his, like his theory on the massive YouTube crash from last year (believed to have been caused by the removal of Google Plus).
As for running a vote he could have just made a strawpoll, and not have gotten people banned for spamming. So in away it really was his own fault. Hopefully he learns the lesson for the next time he wants to hold a vote/poll for the future.
I agree with it partially being his fault and that spamming is bad, but I looked at the community guidelines for YouTube about spam and it doesn't directly state anything about emoji spam, so those people were banned by YouTube's software for something not technically against the rules and denied appeals by the people overseeing the software. People get strikes on anime reaction videos all the time because of the software, even when the reactor obeys the rules of YouTube.
It technically falls under comment spam, and repetitive comments. Even if it doesn't say so in the rules it's still implied. Thus the reason they got flagged, and banned by the bot.
As for the used analogy the reason those videos still get strikes is because the user didn't mute the copyrighted audio. The bot can pick up on these things even if the user thinks it's low enough to not be heard.
So, you'd have to mute the whole video just to be able to post it? Because technically, all the anime audio belongs to the studio/artist, right?
Correct, but you can split the audio mix in the recording software. If done right you can have it only record audio from the mic, and not the audio from whatever is being watched. Using the right headphones, and mic sound filter can help prevent audio feedback. Thus leaving only the video makers voice to be heard in the recording.
You can test this easily by using something as simple as audacity for a test record. You can be silent, and see if the mic picks up any audio from the headphones that are being used. Then you can make adjustment as needed. Lower the headphone volume, and/or sit away from the mic to prevent the audio form being picked up. Once you see no audio vibrations in audacity it should be good to go.