Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Hozzászólási szabályok és irányelvek
Hozzászólás jelentése
I guess you would need to check your sources, right? But that has always been an important part of journalism. I take anything that´s free with a grain of salt.
I still don't understand why you couldn't just have made a topic about deepfakes in general. Why even include that video or "meme", or whatever that is. It's not a word.
If you say "meme", 95% of the planet doesn't even know what it is you are talking about.
Same goes for "deepfakes" really. It's simply an edited video. Which by the way, has been around for like... forever! Since invention of video.
Just people making up non-existing new words for something very simple but happens to be trending for some unexplained reason, that has always been around. :-)
I think we need to ask an alien explaining to us what a "meme" is. I don't even use such words. haha. Anyway, have fun on the forums.
(It's some sort of Kindergarten word. Ha, ha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGrDXeDVYU0
However, seriously. There's already a ton of fake news... Last one I know of was when America spewed out across 7000 media outlets around the world that New Zealand gun law banning failed at only a 1% return. The stats they took where 2 weeks before it even started... that was from people returning their guns in via freewill without the gun law change even in place yet. Rather it was extremely successful...
However, the American Gun Association and the American Military News (who was the one that started the fake news) would rather have you not know that! Yet they are also extremely keen on scapegoating the video games and everything else.
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/07/25/695869/us-fake-news-hits-nz-gun-buyback-efforts
"It was not our intent, nor is it ever our intent to intentionally mislead people." - Is a bs statement, they knew what they where doing and did so extremely well, feeding the same news story around the entire world, across thousands of sites, and extremely quickly to also cover cross-checks, while burying the actual facts. Making it appear extremely believable without question.
Checking your sources. If only we could get people to do that...
You know, that will still not be enough. We want people to check more than just "their" sources.
So the future will have those with enough sense to educate themselves and learn how to think critically, and a bunch of hopeless victims. It's a choice and it doesn't worry me much...people are pretty clueless as it is. Making them more clueless simply makes it easier to find legitimate people with something worthwhile to say.
Yeah, it's the same old song and dance, the difference is the dancers and the stage.
I don't know about easier - you still need to sift around to find those people - and the ratio of clueless to educated is becoming worse.
Many educated people get called clueless because they're not saying what people want to hear.
True.
This may be true, but more to the point, they aren't being listened to in the first place. There's no room (or time) for nuance, analysis, or balanced perspectives in the 24hr new cycle. Social media is a write off already.
Nutrition is a case in point - one response has always been the guiding principle...and no one wants to hear it - a well-balanced diet.
All of the pundits attack each other, that's a symptom of the problem.
People who exclusively consume popular media, and spend all of their time on the internet, are the victims I mentioned earlier. Even just a little bit of time with people who know a thing or two about the subjects they are speaking about, will clearly show that the peanut-gallery is being fed a load of crap on a daily basis. Celebrities are respected more than doctors, for crissakes.
If you think this is about left-wing vs. right-wing, then you're already lost.
What is well balanced for me may not be for you. So I will seek an opinion adjusted to my own metabolism when it comes to diet.
Very agreed, but this is the thing. These people are both the victim and the cause of this problem. Celebrities are nothing without their worshippers.
Again, very true.
I never understood this hatred for "having an agenda". I have an agenda. You have an agenda. Everyone has an agenda. Several, even, usually.
If you don't know what is actually legitimate or not to begin with, how can you question the legitimacy of something?
You know, wars don't just happen because of a couple of "evil people with evil agendas".
Wars are a tad more complex than that. You'd be surprised that "ordinary people" have a lot more influence in their appearance than you may think.
people often claim that it is the forces of not-change holding everything together, and that every time something changes the barrier between carnage and proper procedure temporarily stretches and thins out to accommodate that change. war occurs when that barrier equalizes, and carnage becomes a matter of proper procedures executed to the letter.
a lot of anti-equality talk comes from a loose belief in this idea that we can't ever actually change or progress anything in any meaningful capacity, and that our best hope is to be on the 'right side' of the economic equation while things decide to change on their own. sort of a 'hands-off' approach to managing people, though one which rather ironically has a complicated and draconian set of rules whose only purpose is to 'handle' people.
the same 'we can't change' argument has been used against climate change because it is an appeal to the fundamental belief of a conservative: change is inherently dangerous and thus to be avoided. this puts them in odd, counterproductive circumstances, such as where regrowing a limb is as bad or worse than losing it in the first place.
one example of such growth-adverse thinking would be the 50-year dependence on oil-based technology in spite of clear evidence it will destroy the human race, because getting rid of it would be such an economic shakeup it could cause a world war. after all, the US fighting Japan was explicitly due to oil pricing agreements the US was in control of. so the forces of economic conservatism have worked to ensure that things stay this way forever, because for all its conservatism war is just way too liberal.
in every country which utilizes neoliberal economic policies the standard position is conservative and change may only result as a consequence of conservative thinking within that conservative sphere. as a consequence, most major growth or change events are the result of illegality, such as Uber, electronic scooters, sub-prime mortgages and other knowingly-destructive financial instruments, non-competition agreements, MAT pricing, conglomeration, falsified attacks to prompt wars, racial discrimination appeasement for the sake of social stability, pedophilic power cults which force participation in exchange for access, etc.