Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Eh, was Wreck It Ralph bad? I think it's one of those movies that are so bad it's good, yet it certainly doesn't perform near the quality of Tommy Wiseau's "The Room", so does that mean it's horrible even ironically? I'll have to think about this.
this sentence is
good
fortunately no
lol post it anywhere you want, and yes i agree the room staring tommy wiseau is so bad it's good
why the same reason we do all things in the off topic forums, because it seemed like a good idea at the time and because i'm bored as ♥♥♥♥
no... i'm not... this movie killed my dog... and now i'm out for revenge john wick style
So you could fail for not using proper paragraph format or essay structure?
Say hat you will about the kid, he's got spirit, and apparently, sense of self-deprecating humor. His literary analysis skills leave something to be desired. I can sum this movie up in one paragraph.
Ahem: "Wreck-it-Ralph is a movie about social justice where it's okay to be a Mary Sue who is disadvanteged by the system, but it's not okay to be anything other than a bad guy who learns through his adventures with Mary Sue and allies that just because he has power, doesn't make him right, and they will accept him for that if he sacrifices everything for them. Meanwhile, the Mary Sues continue to be overpowered but a better system is made, indicating a them of social reform."
Alternatively: "Wreck-it-Ralph is a movie about self-healing wherein the very specific everyman protagonist who wanted to become a hero everyone liked is foiled by the system that oppresses other characters. But by allowing those players to cheat and being willing to sacrifice himself, Wreck-It-Ralph defeats ego, the source of all socialist woes, and somehow this garbage revitalizes an arcade meant to symbolize the game industry."
Like those paragraphs or no, the core concepts cannot be denied. Disadvantaged Mary-Sues. Strong, misguided protagonist. Oppressive system (which is, of course, capitalist.) Oppresive villain springing from capitalism because of his devotion to his own ego. Protagonist changing himself by being willing to sacrifice himself for the oppressed. All oppressed characters come together, and now there's a new gaming universe where cutie-pie gets to cheat humans and it's awesome because the girl who is supposed to be controlling her is clearly a loser.
Could social justice be spelled out more clearly if you tried? The weak get to cheat? Whatever happened to the weak being taught to be strong? Classic characters like what's-his-name-or-her-name from every story with a character arc have been replaced with fiat accompanying characters.
Little Loli-pop, or whatever her name is, is automatically good at everything. She just needs a chance, and her chance happens to coincide with Ralph's selfish desire for a medal. She wants a chance, he wants a medal. How subtly obvious. He wants privilege, she wants a chance.
Then we've got Mary Sue number 2, who actually adds some depth to the story and characters. She's a strong, independednt, ass-kicker of a woman with a soft side. I liked her. She was programmed with the most tragic backstory ever. Her husband, a giant Marine guy, was eaten by a bug on their wedding day.
How is that a tragic backstory? She's a space-marine. Speaking as a Marine myself, and a combat veteran, you just have to let death go sometimes. She's certainly willing to sacrifice her squad-mates to get the player to the goal.
Until she meets Fix-It Felix, who is the last beta cuck on Earth such a woman would ever go for. A woman who solves her own personal problems doesn't want some dude who is only apologizing to her. But SJW's do. That's what an SJW "ally" is. It's the white, industrious, polite, and appropriately humiliated character who exist to fix things.
But "Wreck-it" Raplh has to learn through attempted martyrdom and acceptance of his character: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djgKkrYSojk
"I will never be good and that's not bad?" Yes it is! He sounds like a far-left cuck who has surrendered to the idea of white, cis, hetero, LBGTQ artifical intelligence ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. The common human spirit is directed towards self-improvement, not self-victimization. But he survives, impossibly, because he was an ally to the message of the film. If those in power would just be wiling to kill themselves, the innocent parties of the world would find a better world through their power.
Artists cannot create what they do not think, and the message here is clear. Destroy the existing order, give preference to others through your strength, and celebrate when they cheat.
What a lousy ****ing story! What a completely *****y lesson for life! It's like some Communist ****-sucker wrote the plot.
Believe me or don't. It matters little to me, I pride self-reliance, even when I'm drunk. And I just blew the ♥♥♥♥ out of that movie, while drunk.
THAT is how you do a drunken rant, my friend.
you my friend deserve a cookie
same question same answer
Chocolate chip, if you please. I absolutely HATE oatmeal raisin! It looks like chocolate chip until you get it close to your nose and..........I'll let the professional bitcher do the rest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Xm8Ap84DCY