Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
An example could be Payday 2. They release an average update of 500MB every 2 or so weeks. Take control of what you download and don't make it automatic.
Like others have said. Look into network monitoring. 1TB is a huge amount. And monthly? My hard drive is 1TB and after 2 years I struggled filling it. So that's insane whats going on with you.
Still better than Canada where we only have 3 companies who work together and have a monopoly on the market with Canadian crtc (government)working with them to keep competition from coming to Canada (they blocked Verizon a few years back)
Regular internet you're looking at 100 dollars a month with having to rent the modem and that'll give you a 300gb data cap. You want 500gb you gotta pay more.
Both of these things sound like the US. You either live in the country and don't get any choice, live in the suburbs and have 2 "competing" (lol) services, or live in a big city and have *gasp* 3! choices. I've never had more than 2 choices, and one of the providers doesn't usually offer more than 10mb, while the other usually offers 50mb+ to start.
Using public wifi isn't stealing.
Now, there is typically a "fair usage" clause in the public usage agreement that states you can't hog the bandwidth, but they're vague.
Also, am I the only person who notices that it's Comcast and other ISP's that choose what speeds we get, AND they implement data caps (theoretically to save bandwith for others, but also for making them money), yet they STILL went to the FCC and convinced them that they need to be able to throttle certain sites because they use to much data?
Why? We could share water, electricity, and food too! Kidding.
Went to the FCC? More like they ARE the FCC.