2k vs 4k

[mikeward1980]

Is there much noticable difference between the picture qualifty between a 2k monitor and a 4k monitor?

[John Doe]

Lol, you keep making no-senses. 32 inch is perfect for 4k, I used couple 49' 4k TVs in past and this has much sharper image.

It has much sharper image than the 27 inch 2560x1440 Dell IPS I had in past as well, one can clearly tell that when you put the two side by side.

Yes, you do have to use about %125 scaling but that barely makes it less sharper.

PUBG is the only game I do QHD at, because of its piece of crap FPS dips that happen out of nowhere. It doesn't look as good as Battlefront 2 while requiring about twice as much power... it's not a proper case.

[DefinitelyNotMonk]

Yes same size 4k to 1440p has about a 60-70% increase in ppi, but 32 Vs 27 drops that to around 27%.
If you then drop to 1440p for some games you are then down to below standard 1080p clarity, while being capped at 60fps and kind of makes my point why 4k while nice, isn't quite there yet on the hardware front.
However pubg has 2-4x the numbers and 10x the scale, while having comparable detail levels with alot more structures.

[John Doe]

I only drop it for ONE game, which is unbalanced to the most.

In every other title I play, I can AT LEAST do all high at UHD.

[Oriflame]

John Doe の投稿を引用：

tacoshy の投稿を引用：

even tho I disagree with NotMonk it wasnt nonsense. He had a valid poin of opinion and you saying you reach around 60fps proofs his point that you have to stay around 60 fps and wont be able to fully utilize 144fps for 144Hz which is more important for him then higher resolution...

The nonsense part was directed at the guy saying no single GPU is capable of 4k, which is wrong since I have a 1080 Ti and it's capable of it, let alone the Titan XP. But him saying "4k is not worth it" is nonsensical as well.

What valid point of opinion? It's just HIS opinion that 4k is not worth it since it's 60 HZ. There are millions fine with 60 HZ, so what the heck are you trying to say?

Yes, 144 FPS is more fluid but stop with this "60 HZ is not enough" nonsense.

Lol; you are so full of sh*t. That's alright though because professional hardware reviews contradict your malarkey

Wildlands, TitanXP =1080Ti- 37FPS average @4K ultra https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Ghost_Recon_Wildlands/5.html or STRIX 1080Ti if your prefer, 40FPS https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/8205/asus-rog-strix-gtx-1080-ti-oc-review-limit/index8.html

Assassin's Creed Origins-50.1FPS @4K ultra http://www.pcgamer.com/assassins-creed-origins-performance-guide/

The Division-1080Ti 54.7 FPS @4k ultra (note this is nowhere near max settings) https://www.anandtech.com/show/11180/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti-review/11

GTA V-1080Ti @4K 4xMSAA (note nowhere near max settings) 47.91 FPS
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/74853-nvidia-gtx-1080-ti-performance-review-11.html

Fallout 4-1080Ti @4K ultra 47.26 FPS http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/74853-nvidia-gtx-1080-ti-performance-review-10.html

Though if you are talking about a pc version of Candy Crush as your mainstay or console level FPS then disregard.

[Air]

Well, 2K is basically 1080p and 4K is basically 2160p, so yeah there's a huge difference. For gaming purposes, I'd say to just stick with 1440p as a good middle ground for now.

[John Doe]

loki1944 の投稿を引用：

Lol; you are so full of sh*t. That's alright though because professional hardware reviews contradict your malarkey.

No but you are. Why do you think I sold my second 1080 Ti? Because one DOES do 4k in the games I play.

I can find benches of the Titan XP / 1080 Ti performing above 60 FPS in those games. Pulling random benches tells nothing.

I played Dishonored 2, GTA V, Siege and all that, all around high and ultra settings with no problems with my 50 Mhz OC'ed 1080 Ti.

[Oriflame]

John Doe の投稿を引用：

loki1944 の投稿を引用：

Lol; you are so full of sh*t. That's alright though because professional hardware reviews contradict your malarkey.

No but you are. Why do you think I sold my second 1080 Ti? Because one DOES do 4k in the games I play.

I can find benches of the Titan XP / 1080 Ti performing above 60 FPS in those games. Pulling random benches tells nothing.

I played Dishonored 2, GTA V, Siege and all that, all around high and ultra settings with no problems with my 50 Mhz OC'ed 1080 Ti.

Yes, I'm sure you are a special snowflake with a one of a kind 1080Ti that defies professional reviews. There there. What I posted are professional reviews, not some random bs from epeen users. Sorry, lies don't add up to reality. Also, 50Mhz OC on a 1080Ti is pretty weaksauce.

[John Doe]

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/Titan_X_Pascal/19.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/Titan_X_Pascal/16.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1080_Ti_Gaming_X_Trio/21.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1080_Ti_Gaming_X_Trio/13.html

There are your professional reviews, you're a frigging fool.

Do you even own a 1080 Ti with a 4k panel? You clearly do not. Because if you did, you would know that it's very well capable of UHD with some fine tuning, easily up to high and to ultra in AAA titles.

[DefinitelyNotMonk]

to be fair, no one said it couldn't do high, just that it cant max stuff out and is limited to 60.
something you readily admit.
also the only remotely demanding game you linked only just does 60fps at 4k and not maxed out.

[John Doe]

You really don't understand, do you? Turning on insane amount of AA is just pointless and would obviously bog it down to that 40 FPS linked.

You can 2x AA with everything else cranked and the GPU will do that easily in many games.

I AM maxing out the titles I play, at Ultra, enough said.