Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
On a side note, what makes you all so sure that we and life on Earth actually orginated from this planet in the first place? How do you explain multiple humanoid species co-existed at the same time all over the world in isolation, recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution, genes in modern human DNA that cannot be accounted for, i.e, not found in any other animal species on the planet? It's possible that the Earth was (maybe still is) a lab, petri dish for otherworldly beings (either ETI or EDI beings) to run expirientments on and they had probably hit the reset button couple of times already.
Now, I never stated anything against panspermia. It is plausible theory, but if I were to choose between two theories about the origin of life, I'd go with the one mainstream science is currently pushing for. Of course it could be wrong, after all, majority of things we think we know now is just it, a theory. As for the distribution of early humans and humanoid species across the globe, can't say it is my forte but whatever the case may be I really don't find anything unusual about what you stated, migration is intrinsic to our very being. When it comes to adaptive evolution in the human genome there are some conflicting study results. I won't divulge too much on that as I certainly won't be the one to solve it. However, keep in mind that we, thanks to our intelligence can actively pursuit favorable traits when we search for our partners. Over countless generations, that is bound to have some effect that apparently defies nature. Now ETI intervention could be possible, I guess. EDI intervention is too far fetched, and in my opinion more a matter of religious debate.
I am aware of the "un-eroded" sediment part of the footprint.
In NYT's own words "revealed the pattern of dinosaurian digits"...
yet
"The tracks were indeed humanlike"
Keyword "Humanlike"
"Mr. Kuban wrote, ''I have concluded that no genuine human tracks have been found in the Paluxy riverbed.'' "
Keyword "Human". We come from Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal interbreeding. The term "Human" is only used when talking about the modern "hybrid".
For the record I am not on either side, I just like to analyze all available information.
You asked the question then answered it.
If it is possible then how?
If you can explain how to move 100/1000+ tonne blocks, you're hired.
If the ancient Egyptians did build the pyramids why didn't they document it and take credit for their amazing achievement? The Romans took credit for and even bragged about their architecture and engineering.
Also, Sacsayhuaman. How an ancient tribe managed to build it is puzzling.
casus posetive. i mean in space we can atleast hear something, and when we do get a signal they probably be either dead or we have a conversation with their children (if they have same lifespan as humans have.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l60MnDJklnM
Nope. Dinosaurs lived right along with people. In fact, evidence shows the Dinosaur bones we find were from just a few thousand years ago. They find Carbon 14, Soft Tissue, DNA, in Dino bones which means they can NOT be 75 MILLION years old, but only a few thousand at the most. There are many many drawings and carvings of very accurate and correct Dinosaurs from 2,000 to 3,000 years ago found on pots, rocks, and stones. They only way they could have possibly known what a Dinosaur looked like is if they had seen one. The first dinosaur to be described scientifically was Megalosaurus in 1824.
I assure you that Dinos lived among man based on all the know evidence found and the best answers in interpreting that evidence. . All the evidence points to Dinosaurs living with man, regardless of what some people assume based on their poor interpretation of the evidence.
Evidence is all that's left at this point. And Evidence does NOT speak for itself. It must be interpreted by a human. And very often their worldview skews correct interpretation and they get it WRONG.
It's a known fact of science and the laws of nature that blood cells and soft tissue can NOT last MILLIONS of years. Not possible. Some want to hold to their MILLIONS OF YEARS, so they can't figure out WHY there is still dna and soft tissue found along with Carbon 14 in Dinosaur bones. I'll tell you why. The best answer based on known evidence....Dinosaurs lived with man only a few thousand years ago, possibly even just a few hundreds years before they were driven into extinction from hunting.
As for people, there is no way possible they have been around a million years, or even 250,000 years. Too many generational mutations taking place in human DNA each generation for that to be possible. There are about 100 mutations for every gerneration born. People would be EXTINCT by now from genetic information decay caused from mutations.
The farthest KNOWN history of man only dates back about 5,000 years. Hmmm...I wonder why.
So many people ignore the best answer for the evidence found. They want a different story. But that doesn't changed the truth about it.
Hahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahah yeah it definitely wasn't the big fück-off metorite that caused collossal destruction worldwide yeah nah nice try.
Ironically for the creationists, evolution is creating a "Cult of Ignorace", as so aptly put by Isaac Asimov, where the foolish and weak are actually nurtured by society, and are told that their opinion is equally valid, no matter how outlandish and factually incorrect. Flat earthers and creationists are prime examples.
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."
No. I was asking the OP. I don't need to answer anything. Your offer is declined.