모든 토론 > Steam 포럼 > Off Topic > 제목 정보
Scorpius 2017년 11월 5일 오전 12시 11분
I have a choice of either buying Wolfenstein II or Call Of Duty WW2 which should i buy?
I do like both series and i've been with COD since MW2 (Then left after Ghosts). Though i do like historical accuracy and would probably be pissed off if i saw female's running around as soldiers in multiplayer.
< >
전체 댓글 49개 중 16~30개 표시 중
AgentNeebs01 2017년 11월 12일 오후 9시 22분 
mattmoo님이 먼저 게시:
I have Call of Duty WW2, so far I'm not that impressed. Would get wolfenstein 2 if I had that choice again.

Also while Call of Duty is a good looking game, Wolfenstein 2 is probably a better one.
Do you take a look at LGBT calling cards in COD: WW2?
Scorpius 2017년 11월 13일 오후 7시 16분 
SUPERIORGA3E님이 먼저 게시:
mattmoo님이 먼저 게시:
I have Call of Duty WW2, so far I'm not that impressed. Would get wolfenstein 2 if I had that choice again.

Also while Call of Duty is a good looking game, Wolfenstein 2 is probably a better one.
Do you take a look at LGBT calling cards in COD: WW2?
They are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ funny (Not be of offense) But it seems queer to have LGBT and Women in ww2
Fritz 2017년 11월 13일 오후 7시 49분 
I would advise not throwing your money at any of the two, especially Call of Duty. They claim that historical accuracy is a priority, but censor everything pertaining to the flag and insignia. They also throw historical accuracy out of the window for weapon customization including sightings that didn't exist at the time, much like a red dot sight, and include speed clip reloading into pretty much every bolt-action rifle whether or not it had a magnified scope on it.

Personally, I would get Battlefield 1 for a much greater experience both online and offline for the historical accuracy. There are still "sjw" tendencies I wish DICE dropped such as an outrageous minority representation on the front lines having roles like the scout and medic often being subject to "diversification". But it doesn't go overboard like Call of Duty does.
AgentNeebs01 2017년 11월 13일 오후 7시 51분 
☭Scorpius☭님이 먼저 게시:
SUPERIORGA3E님이 먼저 게시:
Do you take a look at LGBT calling cards in COD: WW2?
They are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ funny (Not be of offense) But it seems queer to have LGBT and Women in ww2
It's weird to see LGBT calling cards and black lady Nazis were included in a "historically accurate" WW2 game. It's pretty ridiculous imo.
We are in the Beam 2017년 11월 13일 오후 9시 44분 
Fritz Faust님이 먼저 게시:
I would advise not throwing your money at any of the two, especially Call of Duty. They claim that historical accuracy is a priority, but censor everything pertaining to the flag and insignia. They also throw historical accuracy out of the window for weapon customization including sightings that didn't exist at the time, much like a red dot sight, and include speed clip reloading into pretty much every bolt-action rifle whether or not it had a magnified scope on it.

Personally, I would get Battlefield 1 for a much greater experience both online and offline for the historical accuracy. There are still "sjw" tendencies I wish DICE dropped such as an outrageous minority representation on the front lines having roles like the scout and medic often being subject to "diversification". But it doesn't go overboard like Call of Duty does.
I find especially insulting how lazily diversity is forced in. If they wanted playable black characters they could have added Askari.
Vince ✟ 2017년 11월 13일 오후 9시 50분 
Wolfenstein no doubt about it
Pizmo 2017년 11월 13일 오후 9시 53분 
I'm pretty sure if you asked the steam community to pick between any CoD game, or a kick in the nuts. They would most likely take the kick in the nuts

There is a lot of CoD hate around here
AgentNeebs01 2017년 11월 13일 오후 9시 56분 
Pizmo님이 먼저 게시:
I'm pretty sure if you asked the steam community to pick between any CoD game, or a kick in the nuts. They would most likely take the kick in the nuts

There is a lot of CoD hate around here
I used to love COD franchise but after seeing it being polluted by microtransactions and keeping the same gameplay for more than 10 years, I left the franchise.
Pizmo 2017년 11월 13일 오후 10시 09분 
SUPERIORGA3E님이 먼저 게시:
Pizmo님이 먼저 게시:
I'm pretty sure if you asked the steam community to pick between any CoD game, or a kick in the nuts. They would most likely take the kick in the nuts

There is a lot of CoD hate around here
I used to love COD franchise but after seeing it being polluted by microtransactions and keeping the same gameplay for more than 10 years, I left the franchise.
Meh... AAA games lost their appeal to me about a decade ago (damn I'm old)

Modern Warfare was the beginning of the end for me as far as CoD goes. People just got too ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ good. At the end of a MP match I would have like 20 kills and 80 deaths. It just stopped being fun, and the SP campaigns in CoD have always been kinda meh
s 2017년 11월 13일 오후 10시 51분 
wolfenstein is way too short and you dont even get to kill hitler get cod
We are in the Beam 2017년 11월 14일 오전 3시 17분 
dasdasdasd님이 먼저 게시:
wolfenstein is way too short and you dont even get to kill hitler get cod
You do.
Purveyor of funny cats 2017년 11월 14일 오전 3시 32분 
How about you take that money... and invest it? >:D
anassarg 2017년 11월 14일 오전 5시 26분 
Wolfenstein 2 if u are a soy-boy numale Tumblr browsing SJW, COD for the chance to kill some ((( Allies )))
FutaPowa 2017년 11월 14일 오전 5시 28분 
I would stick with Wolfenstein.
☆Kay☆ 2017년 11월 14일 오전 5시 34분 
Both are pretty good, personally I would go for Wolfenstein though. It's so over the top and silly.
< >
전체 댓글 49개 중 16~30개 표시 중
페이지당 표시 개수: 1530 50

모든 토론 > Steam 포럼 > Off Topic > 제목 정보
게시된 날짜: 2017년 11월 5일 오전 12시 11분
게시글: 49