安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
It's so widespread even Pixar uses it. A lot.
Making a quick buck is easier said than done, because airing a late night anime makes no money by itself. Unless people are inspired to buy the Blu-rays and merchandise and whatever else is available, the anime is not going to make money. Streaming has changed this somewhat, but even then you need to give people a reason to tune in. The sheer number of anime alone nowadays means people can't and won't watch all of it.
The biggest factor in the quality of an anime is not budget, but the caliber of the staff (there is no better illustration of this than Kemono Friends). That's not a matter of money (better artists are more expensive), but a matter of connections, interest and availability. People don't make much money working on anime.
This is just a popular myth, and saying that Kyoto Animation is "low budget" is rather bizarre given that they are probably the most consistently high quality studio in the business, at least when it comes to television animation.
Sure there are cultural simularities, but it's rarely enough to make two shows look the same.
For example, just take a look at the really big Shonen anime:
Dragonball, Naruto, One Piece, JoJo, and HunterXhunter
Do they look the same? No, they don't.
Generalization is a fallacy you know...
So if you really take a 60,000-foot view of it, yeah.
(I say "60,000-foot view" despite the usual turn of phrase being "30,000-foot view", because even at that view one can tell that's there's a significant difference between, for example, DBZ and Jojo on one side, and Lucky Star and Yuru Yuri on the other. The difference is big enough that I can bet that our friend Teabλg Johnson probably hates the latter more than the former.)
That doesn't make any sense.
It would be like me calling all sitcoms bad because I watched "Fuller House" and "Alf".
And you know this based on the FIVE anime you've seen? Not only that, but people inexperienced with anime can't even see the subtle and even not so subtle differences in art styles.
How am I not paying attention to what you're saying?
But, as we have established, it isn't a flaw. There is no epidemic of comically oversized breasts in anime. You brought it up and kept talking about it, even though it was all in your head. You are the one who is obsessed.
Clarify?
Was just about to log into Crunchyroll, thanks forthe headsup.
As for people talking about naime being good or bad.. Its fine. If you like anime thats great, and if you don't thats okay too.
All anime is bad even though it's a huge generalization and that I watched only 5 anime because big tits and all artstyles look the same even though DBZ and Death Note aren't the same artstyle
What is this example supposed to illustrate?
What does this have to do with what I said?
What am I defending? There is nothing to defend. This epidemic that you think exists does not exist. There is nothing for me to defend here. There is no epidemic of comically oversized breasts in anime.
Apparently there is something to defend; since you keep arguing here ad nauseam.