Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
All hell will break loose if that happens in either way.
That's the thing, we don't matter at all to the universe. We just don't understand how truly insignificant our place in the universe really is. Our hubris is staggering. We're a cosmic ant hill that no one cares enough to stop and take a whizz on.
You might be surprised.
I keep a pretty close eye on space science - there's at least ten different programs set up to either re-direct, destroy or otherwise neutralise incoming objects.
The zaniest solution is a space probe armed with a massive bladder of white paint. Light reflection can actually produce slight thrust - by making one side of a very large object extremely reflective you could theoretically change it's orbit.
And you only have to make a fractional adjustment to the trajectory to completely avoid an impact.
Stopping a large astroid with paint.... now that is something i want to see.
Me too. It's absolutely sound science: The basic idea is to make one side of the asteroid or comet heat up, with a mix of effects pushing it onto a different orbit over a period of weeks. It absolutely should work... ...in theory. Not sure I'd want to rely on it, though.
Was that aimed at me?