安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I don't understand this urge people have in here to decide what strangers can or cannot enjoy.
You are being extremely idealistic. Valve lost its indie image a long time ago. It is up there with Ubisoft and EA. Of course they care about profits. What corporation wouldn't?
aaand again "it's about RELIABLE INCOME. To do so, you must have customers who put their faith in what you can give and or produce. If you are putting out more crap than good, you are losing money and customers. What good does it do if someone new comes to steam, gets a game, finds it garbage, gets a refund and leaves? Especially if they tell others, as in, viewing for instance a replacement game to find a sea of negative ratings of practically every product listed?"
You are merely hanging yourself to keep a PURE profits without any sort of tact or logic behind how to MAINTAIN SAID PROFITS type of business.
In all fairness though, console games are going to ♥♥♥♥ like they were in the late 90's, I guess it makes sense computers gaming will as well.
Look at the PS4 and Xbox One. There are more "LET'S RELEASE THE SAME GAMES WE DID 10 YEARS AGO OR SOMETIME IN BETWEEN THEN" games on Gamestop shelves as opposed to actual new games. The few new games that DO come out, are completely unoriginal and aren't selling well.
Gaming is in a rutt.
Sweetie. If you want to claim it as poor busin ess practices... you'll have to bring up the accounts ledger andprove it.
/b/ is that way, Aspie. If you're going to resort to being a condescending little millenial POS, please stay with the other basement dwellers.
I have a degree in business and business economics. Tell me when you make floor shift leader at your local McDonalds.
You only need common sense to see these things regardless, FFS.
Regardless, I've seen several companies as of late destroy themselves this way. I just think it's sad that this is becoming the norm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGCyfEYfLks
Steam knows that they cannot do that as it would hurt the market more. A single point of curation for games would be literally the worst thing for PC gaming. Any more than if Walmart was suddenly 'curating' all PC games
If you wanted steam to be an actual monopoly then sure. I don't
steam still makes their money and we dont have to deal with the headache of sifting through ♥♥♥♥ for hours on end.
It has mostly negative reviews and people crushed it in the forums .
For $1,99 , i thought it was a fun playthrough . So i guess i bought a " feces " game .
My choice , my money .
No , It is a fair market on Steam .
I know what i am looking for and Steam gives me ideas by letting me choose my favorite genre via the home page .
I subscribe to PC Gamer and learn about what's to come before Steam even gets a whiff of it . This helps me to know what to look for in the future .
To tell an Indie Developer that their games will be catagorized and or not be shown on the home page of Steam would be an unfair practice . Segregation is a bad idea for Steam .
Steam holds hands with all Developers as both are in the market to make money .
We all have opinions and this is just mine .
Thanks , HMZ
Nice sugestion aswell orion.
A logical postulate for the recent influx of poor reviews might be attributed to the Steam review system. Memes, jokes, and poor 4chan-esque recaps of gameplay tend to be the top comment, followed by tons of negative reviews, most of which don't accurately assess and critique the game in a fair way.
I think it is better to actually play some of these games - instead of believing every negative review you come across. You might find a different outcome, perspective of the game, counter to what you read about.
Remember: those who have a positive experience with a product are not as likely to leave a review as opposed to someone who had the opposite experience; therefore, we can also assume that most of the reviews are written only by a small sect of the overall community.
And to remark briefly upon this notion that poorly reviewed games should be cut from the marketplace: Steam is a games distribution service, in the same way that Amazon, eBay, and Jet are distribution services. Amazon does not remove items with horrible reviews, so why should Steam? Some of the best content moderation any consumer has lies in their ability to research a game, thoroughly, before buying it. Don't blame Steam. Don't blame good and honest devs.