安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I put that "there" in there and it was right because it pointed out your sentence.
And yes fair enough, i didn't click my keyboard hard enough and missed an "n" from sentence. Unlike you, i acknowledge my mistake, which was a typo, not a grammar fail anyway.
Edit: "captialized" is in fact capitalized so you lose.
"The second "is" there needs to be removed."
See, you want to get all up in arms on her about grammar and you screwed up yourself.
Don't say it was a typo cause it wasn't.
It should be: The second "is" there, needs to be removed.
Just like her you forgot a comma and you got all bent out of shape about it. Since you think your miss perfect you think you make no mistakes. But sorry everyone makes mistakes and you got to learn that and how to deal with making a mistake. Like I said when people debate anything with you, you see something that you disagree with and you want to start insulting people.
Exhibit 1: A mod and you got into a debate about the WII and you didn't like something he said you started insulting him and his intelligenc.
Exhibit 2: You was banned off the boards a second time. But I'm not sure for what. If i had to fathom a guess I would say it was for insulting others also.
So you see you just didn't do it to me but you done it to others. So your track record don't look so good, so far this year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization#Sentence_case
And i should've used a comma why exactly? Because it sounds better to you? My sentence was structurally correct even without a comma. You can't even tell the difference between your and you're.
Not gonna look at that cause you still haven't caught on to the fact that you wrote "captialized" instead of "capitalized", and that's precisely what i corrected.
CAP TI A LIZE
CAP IT A LIZE
Get it?
Yeah I'm looking for a decent 40-43 inch 4k monitor for games on my pc but I keep reading about problems this one or that one has. Like I was all ready to buy a Philiips 40"+ monitor but then I noticed people saying the corners had a slight darkening. I even saw photos of it on the net. Well to hell with that, and I kept looking. Like a Dell 40"+ monitor but I read its colors are not as good as other brands.
Anyway if you, MollyMo, can recommend a great 4k 40"+ pc monitor then I'll order it because I have the video card for it, a Nvidia Titan X Pascal on a i7 6700 system. There may be some stuttering on the one card, but I can always go sli if I have to.
This is all with the assumption that 4k TVs are not as good as 4k monitors for gaming. Even the LG 4k OLED TV. That's right imo a decent 4k 40"+ monitor is superior for games for graphics than any LG 4k OLED TV. If LG or anyone else made a OLED 4k TV that's as good as a monitor for visuals in games then I'd already have it hooked up to my pc now.
Edit: I'm kinda on topic talking about 4k since it was mentioned in the title.
You said monitors so i take you're not looking for tvs, which kinda narrows down your options. I think the best way to make a choice is to pick a price range and certain features you want (if any), which will narrow it down further, and then check ratings and read reviews for each monitor. I don't want to recommend any because i haven't really looked into 4k monitors so i don't really know which ones are better. As far as i see tho, there aren't that many 4k monitors over 40 inches, so the fewer options should make it easier to choose.
And holy hell your pc is a damn monster.
Not really that familiar with oleds (cause some cost more than a sports car lol), but they are supposed to have the best image quality with their black levels and color gambuts and whatnot. I think the regular refresh rate terms don't apply to them as well, because oled panels can refresh extremely fast for some reason i don't know.
I think you will probably find that the televisions are equal if not superior to dedicated monitors. It has been almost a couple years now since I purchased my forty three inch Bravia, but back then it pretty much put every dedicated monitor to shame. Both in terms or quality and performance. Not to mention that the monitors were overpriced, and had nowhere near the real estate. Just my two cents, but if the monitors haven't improved substantially in the interim. That a monitor would be a poor investment.