Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Though I don't understand having a.... weird feeling against 15 years old is considered a "pedo".
I mean not going to defend this guy or anything, but hey
I am not so familiar with ESEA but maybe:
1) Their system requires a temporary duration
2) They have a policy where certain types of offence warrant temporary bans ('Malicious Activity' isn't very specific)
3) It's actually making an example. The language is psychological, like selling things for 1.99 to make you think itäs less thqan 2 quid, though in this case the thousand years makes you appreciate it's pretty severe.
I'm inclined to agree.
I'l remember if I ever need to ban you, I'l cap it at 99 years ;)
People don't understand that if they can ban someone for a 1000 years for this then they could ban someone for 1000 years for doing anything they don't personally approve of.
Gamers are a bunch of emotionally sensitive twerps.