Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Other then that its decent..
you could build your own for less if you dont mind assembling it and installing windows yourself
cpu, 6
ram, 6 8g is enough but 1333 is pretty slow for a new system
hdd, 5 no ssd
odd 5, no bluray
gpu, 3 better than any intel but not good enough for games on med-high
psu, if its under 600w you cant put a good gpu in it without upgrading it first
case, room for a big gpu and multiple hdd/ssd
1333 pretty slow? There is no noticable difference between 1333 and something with 2000.
I'm running 1333 as well and I'm everytime the first person on the map (on every, but sometimes not, if I sleep) in Battlefield 3 so what the ♥♥♥♥.
PS: They even censored my f.u.c.k at the end, lol.
PS#2: SSD's? Look what I said before. They are wasting of money, I don't have a SSD and my computer still boots up in under 30 seconds (completely loaded, on the destkop).
Actually yes there is, there is a significant difference between 1333 and 2000 in a variety of applications (in fact, I have a program that requires 4000Mhz dual or 2000Mhz quad channel memory in order to run optimally), there is an even greater difference if you are using an APU. However, 1333 isn't inherently bad. How fast you load a map has little to do with RAM speed, and more to do with hard drive read speed. Memory speed only affects the latency in which your RAM can send and receive data to and from the CPU, so if you run any programs that are constantly accessing the contents of RAM you will want fast memory.
All other parts are good enough for modern games.
And you didn't mentioned price, maybe if it's very cheap, you shouldn't care about GPU now, and just replace it later...
some 10k rpm drives are pretty close to sata2 max (3g/s)
most spinning drives cant even fill up sata1 (1.5g/s) bandwidth
many newer ssd drives can use most of the sata3 (6g/s) bandwidth
hdd comp chart pcmark 7 storage
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/hdd-charts-2012/-10-PCMark-7-System-Storage,2908.html
ssd comp chart pcmark 7 storage
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/ssd-charts-2011/PCMark-7-System-Storage,2804.html
even the fasteset hdd is slower than the slowest ssd tested
and for the price/vs preformance on ram, its only about $4 to go from 1333 to 1600 for most 4g kits
Noob question of the day, Gpu is the graphics card right?