Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Dit topic is vastgepind, dus het is waarschijnlijk belangrijk 
Regels en richtlijnen voor discussies
68 
Dit bericht rapporteren
os is Endeavouros (archlinux based OS)
the pc itself is dell optiplex 3010 sff
cpu is intel i5 3470
gpu is amd r5 240 (it sucks ass but better than nothing. it's a long story tho on how and why i get these card)
ram is 10gb (don't ask why)
i got 120gb ssd and 250gb hdd
the moniter is hp l1908w (old monitor and it's suck. but better than nothing)
can't tell which one should i upgrade. the monitor or gpu
CPU: Intel Core i7-10750H
GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
RAM: 32GB (2x 16 GB PC4-25600)
SSD1: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
SSD2: WD SN730 1 TB
Display: FHD 17" 240Hz
Mouse: Zowie Benq EC2
Headset: HyperX Cloud II
I used liquid metal paste for cooling CPU and GPU (i can make a new thread if you are interested) to stop CPU throttling
The 1030 is a disaster and a joke by comparison.
Example:
https://www.amazon.com/XFX-Speedster-SWFT105-Graphics-RX-64XL4SFG2/dp/B09Y7358KJ/
i7-4790.
RTX 3080.
Asus B85M-E motherboard.
16gbs DDR3 RAM.
1tb Samsung 860 Evo.
He wants Small Form Factor.
In this area, the rx6400 is actually king of the pack right now. The 6400 and some models of the 6500xt offer the absolute most compute power in a small package consumer GPU.
Period.
If you want a single slot low profile card, there is nothing better than a 6400 or specific 6500xt models.
Fact.
Now, you want to argue that? Go find me a singe slot half height card that beats them? I will wait.
There is a single card I know of on the NV side, and its a quadro that's 3-4x the price of the 6500xt (the one in the last vid, $750 bucks, also double slot) (albeit also near twice the power too, closer to the 3050, but again entirely dif price category and a single off example).
For 4K/60 is sort of doable, but even then, that 4790 will hold back the 3080 substantially in CPU intensive games. When I first got my 3070 Ti last year, I paired it with my 4770K which was running at 4.5Ghz, and the bottleneck was incredible. I had never seen CPU bottleneck quite like this. Even in GPU intensive benchmarks, like Firestrike rendered at 1080p and Timespy rendered at 1440p, I was not able to get even close to full GPU usage. Firestrike Ultra and Timespy Extreme, which are both rendered at 4K, I was able to get full GPU usage. And in games at 4K, CPU bottleneck was eliminated for the most part. But in CPU intensive games, like GTA 5 and such, even at 4K, the 4770K bottleneck'd the 3070 Ti quite a bit.
But this was only temporary and I built a new system. But playing at 4K, sure I could have stuck with the 4770K, but there was still a lot of bottleneck in CPU intensive games. But it wasn't only that, the bottleneck caused microstutter even in GPU intensive games, during CPU heavy parts. So put simply, the 4770K bottleneck'd the 3070 TI quite a bit and it was not ideal.
If you are playing at 1440p or 1080p, forget it. Unless you plan on upgrading and building a new PC around the 3080, IMO, you just wasted a bunch of money on that 3080. That 4790 is no where fast enough for that 3080. You will be lucky to get 50% GPU usage in some cases, and you will be wondering why performance is not all that much better than the 1080. I really hope that it is only temporary. But to each their own.
But like I said, evening playing at 4K, with my 3070 Ti paired with my 4770K @ 4.5Ghz, I was not happy with the bottleneck I was getting. Not ideal. I can only imagine how bad it is a with a slower 4790 and a 3080, at 1080 or 1440p. I bought a 10700k, and that pretty much eliminated the CPU bottleneck with my 3070 Ti. But even at 1080p, there can still be CPU bottleneck in CPU intensive games. That is how powerful these GPUS are. And a 3080 can be 25 to 30% more powerful than a 3070 Ti. Ouch.,
Like I said, I guess at 4K, it can be doable. But R6 is more GPU intensive if I am not mistaken, with some CPU intensive moments. Does he do system, CPU/GPU, monitoring? How is the performance? Is he getting better performance than he did with the 1080? And how about making use of that 4K/120Hz. Is he getting up to 120FPS, and what is the GPU usage at?
To each their own, but I still don't quite understand. If it is basically an eSport rig and only plays R6, then why bother spend all that money on a 3080? And if he has the money for a 3080, does he have enough to upgrade the rest of the system? I would.
Anyway, to each their own, and maybe I being a little too nosy, but I personally find that spending that much money on a 3080 to put into a system with an i7 4790 non "K" is a waste and leaving a lot of performance in the box. That is, untapped performance.