Share your computer setup!

[AVLNCH]

Do you have a speedy new system that you’d love to show off to the world? Perhaps you’re someone who just plays casually on the home PC? Why not post your setup in here to share & compare with other members of the Steam community!

[ChickenBalls]

It's Chase の投稿を引用：

**DeiRowtag の投稿を引用：

I'm starting to experience some lag on recent titles but it gets the job done

Screen (x2) :color: Dell

Case :color: Antec P182

GPU :color: geforce 8800GTS

CPU :color: Intel Core 2 Duo E4600

RAM :color: Crucial Ballistix DDR2 2x2GB

MB :color: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L

PW :color: Corsair VX450W

HDD :color: Seagate 250GB

Keyboard :color: Dell

Mouse :color: Razer DeathAdder

Mousepad :color: Cat carpet

Great mid range card back in the day. Driver support was a bit iffy if you were running Vista back then, but the card aged very well going into the early 2010s.

considering that guy owns RE4 Remake and Eldenring it is safe to assume that hes lying.
don't know why he would list a PC from 2007 but online people are just weird

[MonkehMaster]

ChickenBalls の投稿を引用：

It's Chase の投稿を引用：

Great mid range card back in the day. Driver support was a bit iffy if you were running Vista back then, but the card aged very well going into the early 2010s.

considering that guy owns RE4 Remake and Eldenring it is safe to assume that hes lying.
don't know why he would list a PC from 2007 but online people are just weird

why would we assume that?

[ChickenBalls]

MonkehMaster の投稿を引用：

ChickenBalls の投稿を引用：

considering that guy owns RE4 Remake and Eldenring it is safe to assume that hes lying.
don't know why he would list a PC from 2007 but online people are just weird

why would we assume that?

your ignorance is amusing

[MonkehMaster]

ChickenBalls の投稿を引用：

MonkehMaster の投稿を引用：

why would we assume that?

your ignorance is amusing

what ignorance?

[Mr Shadow]

Name: MSI-AM5 (Trying to think of better name) (5th pc i have built)
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (4.5 GHz)
Thermal Compound: Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
CPU Cooler: Corsair iCUE H100i ELITE LCD XT
MOBO: MSI MPG X670E Carbon Wifi AM5
RAM: Kingston FURY Beast RGB 64GB (2x 32GB) (DDR5-6000) CL36
GPU: MSI RTX 4070 Ti 12GB
>> DeepCool GH-01 GPU Holder
Case: be quiet! Dark Base 700
Power Supply: Corsair RM1000e (2023 Model) 1000 W Atx 3.0 80+ Gold
Storage:
Boot:
>> OS: Windows 10 Pro
>> WD Black SN850X 2TB
Storage:
>> Seagate FireCuda 4TB
>> Seagate IronWolf 4TB
>> Samsung 980 PRO 1TB (M.2)
>> Samsung 870 EVO 1TB
>> Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
>> 2x Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB (M.2) (Raid 1)
External Drives:
>> Kingston A400 480GB in external 2.5 case
>> WD Green 256GB in external m2 case
>> Seagate External Drive 1TB
>> Seagate External Drive 4TB
>>> Terra Master D4-300 4-bay enclosure
>> 2x Seagate IronWolf 8TB
Cooling:
>> 1x 140mm Corsair LL140 fan
>> 2x 140mm be quiet! Silent Wings 3

Monitors: Acer Nitro VG1 (27')(2560x1440)
EVICIV Touchscreen (7`)(1920x1080)

[UserNotFound]

MonkehMaster の投稿を引用：

ChickenBalls の投稿を引用：

considering that guy owns RE4 Remake and Eldenring it is safe to assume that hes lying.
don't know why he would list a PC from 2007 but online people are just weird

why would we assume that?

I think he's alluding to RE4R requiring a DX12 card + 4GB VRAM (at the minimum), the 8800GTS is only DX11 and has only 512MB VRAM. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...

[⎠⎝Zushikatetomoto⎠⎝ UFO]

UserNotFound の投稿を引用：

MonkehMaster の投稿を引用：

why would we assume that?

I think he's alluding to RE4R requiring a DX12 card + 4GB VRAM (at the minimum), the 8800GTS is only DX11 and has only 512MB VRAM. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...

Here is a better one.
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/palit-8800-gts-sonic-1-gb.b4961

[Sadistic Sweety]

UserNotFound の投稿を引用：

MonkehMaster の投稿を引用：

why would we assume that?

I think he's alluding to RE4R requiring a DX12 card + 4GB VRAM (at the minimum), the 8800GTS is only DX11 and has only 512MB VRAM. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...

You're right and it's weird why people lie about their own property or what games they play. Weirdos indeed. Unless he like plays remote or on a friend's PC, or..something xD

[ChickenBalls]

Sadistic Sweety の投稿を引用：

UserNotFound の投稿を引用：

I think he's alluding to RE4R requiring a DX12 card + 4GB VRAM (at the minimum), the 8800GTS is only DX11 and has only 512MB VRAM. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...

You're right and it's weird why people lie about their own property or what games they play. Weirdos indeed. Unless he like plays remote or on a friend's PC, or..something xD

I think he wanted to do the opposite of those who lie about having very high end PCs.

[xSOSxHawkens]

UserNotFound の投稿を引用：

MonkehMaster の投稿を引用：

why would we assume that?

I think he's alluding to RE4R requiring a DX12 card + 4GB VRAM (at the minimum), the 8800GTS is only DX11 and has only 512MB VRAM. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...

DX 10, not DX11.

NV 8k was first DX 10, but lacked the shortly added HW level support for DX 10.1, something AMD had the first card for. AMD was then the first to the DX 11 punch with the Radeon HD 5k line.

8800 (various) came with anywhere from 256mb to as high as 1gb+ (for some third party unique models) with most at the 320/512/640mb spots.

[Illusion of Progress]

The GTX and Ultra were 768 MB (maybe some had 1.5 GB but I'm not sure).

The GTS had 320 MB or 640 MB (same GPU besides different VRAM amount, remember when nVidia actually did that right?).

The latter GT had 512 MB (some had 256 MB, a few maybe even 1 GB, but again same GPU regardless and most had 512 MB) and was actually faster than the GTSs and almost as fast as the GTX. nVidia basically reused it for the 9800 GT, so it was honestly just that and released early in the 8000 lineup for... some reason. They even cannibalized their own lineup releasing it. It was honestly (almost) the only GPU worth buying for a while.

Sort of miss mine.

[xSOSxHawkens]

Illusion of Progress の投稿を引用：

The GTX and Ultra were 768 MB (maybe some had 1.5 GB but I'm not sure).

The GTS had 320 MB or 640 MB (same GPU besides different VRAM amount, remember when nVidia actually did that right?).

The latter GT had 512 MB (some had 256 MB, a few maybe even 1 GB, but again same GPU regardless and most had 512 MB) and was actually faster than the GTSs and almost as fast as the GTX. nVidia basically reused it for the 9800 GT, so it was honestly just that and released early in the 8000 lineup for... some reason. They even cannibalized their own lineup releasing it. It was honestly (almost) the only GPU worth buying for a while.

Sort of miss mine.

the 9800 variants were actually just re-badged 8800 cards.

[Illusion of Progress]

Can't say I agree with that. They were small uplifts in performance, yes, but only one was identical (the 8800 GT and 9800 GT). And in that case, I'd say it's more the other way around and that the 8800 GT was actually a "pre-release" 9800 GT. It's too obvious.

For one, the 8800 GT was quite different than the original 8800 series (which was the GS, original GTS pair, and GTX/Ultra). It also came quite a bit later from the rest, and had a core name "G92" while all the others were "G80" which was seriously telling. It made zero sense that it was FAR better than the original GTS pair (and basically equaled the GTX) while having a lesser suffix.

So it's more that it was a 9800 GT that was released early and called the 8800 GT, for whatever reason.

Same happened with the GTS where it got a 512 MB version (this was also G92, or rather G92B which was the same thing with a bit more cores/TMUs).

So the actual 9800 GT ended up as nothing but an overclocked 8800 GT. It's the same GPU exactly...

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-gt.c201

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-9800-gt.c635

I remember this because I remember doing a build a bit before the GeForce 9 series released, and wanted to go with that, so I settled on a GeForce 8600 GTS OC to hold me over in the meantime despite it being an AWFUL value. Then the GeForce 9 series comes and the 9800 GT is the 8800 GT. So I just got an 8800 GT in the end.

The rest of the 9800s weren't huge uplifts either, but they were not re-badges.

The 9800 GTX (compared to the 8800 GTX) had twice the TMUs, but lost a third of the ROPs and a third of the bus width (meaning also a third of the VRAM).

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-gtx.c187

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-9800-gtx.c207

It was the "same architecture", sure, but it's like calling the GeForce 500 cards re-badged GeForce 400 just because both were Fermi, or the GeForce 700 cards re-badged GeForce 600 just because both were Kepler. Maybe true only if EVERYTHING else is the same, but that was only the case for the GT.

Then there was the whole 9800 GTX+.

What you might be thinking of is how one of the the 8800 GTS 512 MB later got re-badged as the GTS 250? That was true.

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-gts-512.c758

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gts-250.c241

Overall, things weren't much less strange back then than they are today, to be honest. The difference is, those later 8800 and 9800 were "normal" size chips rather than large chips despite being "flagships", and nVidia priced them accordingly with the fact they were cheaper chips. Difference today is they are pricing cheaper chips up and over-naming them. I wish we now had the nVidia from back then instead.

[xSOSxHawkens]

Illusion of Progress の投稿を引用：

Can't say I agree with that. They were small uplifts in performance, yes, but only one was identical (the 8800 GT and 9800 GT). And in that case, I'd say it's more the other way around and that the 8800 GT was actually a "pre-release" 9800 GT. It's too obvious.

For one, the 8800 GT was quite different than the original 8800 series (which was the GS, original GTS pair, and GTX/Ultra). It also came quite a bit later from the rest, and had a core name "G92" while all the others were "G80" which was seriously telling. It made zero sense that it was FAR better than the original GTS pair (and basically equaled the GTX) while having a lesser suffix.

So it's more that it was a 9800 GT that was released early and called the 8800 GT, for whatever reason.

Same happened with the GTS where it got a 512 MB version (this was also G92, or rather G92B which was the same thing with a bit more cores/TMUs).

So the actual 9800 GT ended up as nothing but an overclocked 8800 GT. It's the same GPU exactly...

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-gt.c201

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-9800-gt.c635

I remember this because I remember doing a build a bit before the GeForce 9 series released, and wanted to go with that, so I settled on a GeForce 8600 GTS OC to hold me over in the meantime despite it being an AWFUL value. Then the GeForce 9 series comes and the 9800 GT is the 8800 GT. So I just got an 8800 GT in the end.

The rest of the 9800s weren't huge uplifts either, but they were not re-badges.

The 9800 GTX (compared to the 8800 GTX) had twice the TMUs, but lost a third of the ROPs and a third of the bus width (meaning also a third of the VRAM).

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-gtx.c187

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-9800-gtx.c207

It was the "same architecture", sure, but it's like calling the GeForce 500 cards re-badged GeForce 400 just because both were Fermi, or the GeForce 700 cards re-badged GeForce 600 just because both were Kepler. Maybe true only if EVERYTHING else is the same, but that was only the case for the GT.

Then there was the whole 9800 GTX+.

What you might be thinking of is how one of the the 8800 GTS 512 MB later got re-badged as the GTS 250? That was true.

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-gts-512.c758

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gts-250.c241

Overall, things weren't much less strange back then than they are today, to be honest. The difference is, those later 8800 and 9800 were "normal" size chips rather than large chips despite being "flagships", and nVidia priced them accordingly with the fact they were cheaper chips. Difference today is they are pricing cheaper chips up and over-naming them. I wish we now had the nVidia from back then instead.

You are linking to, and looking at, specs and architecture, not looking at real world...

From the time:

https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-launches-geforce-9800-gt.html

guru3d の投稿を引用：

NVIDIA just launched the GeForce 8800 9800 GT.

As expected there's nothing really special about this product as it is nothing else other than a rebadged GeForce 8800 GT. In fact the specifications are too close to call a difference in performance whatsoever.

additionally:

https://techenclave.com/threads/nvidia-rebranding-8800gt-again.71557/

https://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/9427-geforce-9800-gt-is-a-rebranded-8800-gt

NV then additionally rebranded the 8800 9800 to the GTS 250. Brandception. Both teams do it from time to time every few generations.

[Sadistic Sweety]

ChickenBalls の投稿を引用：

Sadistic Sweety の投稿を引用：

You're right and it's weird why people lie about their own property or what games they play. Weirdos indeed. Unless he like plays remote or on a friend's PC, or..something xD

I think he wanted to do the opposite of those who lie about having very high end PCs.

LOL, you're probably right. Gave me a wild idea to give mine a stamp of approval, now you live in these forums forevaaa! <3 lolll

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2986719900&fileuploadsuccess=1