Share your computer setup!

[AVLNCH]

Do you have a speedy new system that you’d love to show off to the world? Perhaps you’re someone who just plays casually on the home PC? Why not post your setup in here to share & compare with other members of the Steam community!

[carl]

Just done a recent upgrade to an existing system:

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
MSI MPG Tomahawk X570
2 x 16GB DDR4 Corsair Dominator Platinum 3600 MHz
Noctua NH-U9S
RX Vega 56 Gigabyte Gaming 8GB HBM2
Seasonic Focus PX750
Intel P600 M.2 500GB / Arch Linux
Corsair Force MP600 m.2 nvme PCIE gen 4 1TB / Windows 10 Home
Storage: Samsung Evo 850 1TB, Samsung Evo 860 1TB
Case Silverstone GD09
Monitor Acer Predator XB271HU 1440p / 144Hz, on the look out for a 1080p high refresh rate monitor

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2360270871

[SUBBIE]

Cpu: Amd ryzen 7 3700x
Cpu cooler: just the stock nothing special
Motherboard: msi b550 gaming edge WiFi
Ram: Corsair vengeance 2x8 3200mhz rgb
Gpu: Nvidia GeForce Rtx 3070 founders edition
SSD: samsung 970 evo 1tb nvme m.2
PSU: corsair cx750m
Case: corsair carbide 275r


Monitor: 27'' Alienware aw27somethingsomething 240hz
Mouse: Razer viper mini
Keyboard: razer Blackwidow v2 tourament edition chroma
Headset: razer blackshark v2
Razer headphones stand
Razer gigantus v2 medium mousepad

[Journetta]

If only you could post pictures here..

[[OT]Nekrage]

Messaggio originale di xSOSxHawkens:

Messaggio originale di OTNekrage:

https://youtu.be/UXfNrb_Huzg

Only 6k due to scalpers...

Nope. MSRP comes out to 6k.

[Mr. Old Timer 58]

Messaggio originale di Maisy:

If only you could post pictures here..

You can...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2362477401

[dOBER]

Upgrade/Update:

CPU: i9-10900K@5.3
GPU: Asus RTX 3090 Strix OC
RAM: 16GB HyperX Preadtor 4800 MHz
PSU: Asus ROG Thor 1200W Platinum
Mobo: Asus Maximus XII Extrem Z490
Cooling: Custom 4x480 Radiator. 34x Lian LI UNI Fan
Case: Corsair 1000D

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2362605472

Water loop was build for a 3080 and now it doesnt fit anymore till i have a new block :/

[luipermom]

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3500x
GPU: MSI Geforce GTX 750Ti 2GB
RAM: 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000 MHz
HD: Kingston A2000 240 GB SSD M.2 (O.S.) + Kingston A400 480 GB SSD SATA (Steam Lib)
PSU: TOOQ TQXGEII-700SAP
MB: MSI B450M Pro-M2 MAX
Cooling: Cooler Master MasterLiquid Lite 120
Case: Aerocool Bolt Mini
Monitor: Philips 243V7QDAB

[בתאניה]

CPU: Ryzen 9 3900XT

MB: MSI MEG X570 ACE Gaming

GPU: EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti stock OCed

RAM: CORSAIR Dominator Platinum (AMD Ryzen Ready) 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4 3200

Drives: 2x SAMSUNG 980 PRO M.2 2280 500GB, NVMe 1.3c in a RAID 0 config
---
1x WD Black 512GB Performance SSD - M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe (OS Drive)

PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G+, 80 Plus Gold

CPU cooling: be quiet! PURE LOOP 360mm All-In-One Water Cooling System, CPU Cooler, Pure Wings 2 120mm PWM Fans (never goes past 160F with all cores maxed out)

CASE: Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C Gunmetal Brushed Aluminum / Steel ATX Silent Modular Tempered Glass Window Mid Tower

Case cooling: Three silent high-airflow Dynamic X2 GP-14 140 mm fans in the front and 1 140 mm rear ( liquid cooling rad and fans remove the rest of the heat )

Monitors:
Screen #1 Samsung U28E850 (SAM0CCB)
Screen #1 Spec 27.7 inches (70.4 cm) / 3840 x 2160 pixels @ 40-60 Hz
Screen #2 BenQ EL2870U (BNQ7949)
Screen #2 Spec 27.8 inches (70.6 cm) / 3840 x 2160 pixels @ 24-76 Hz

OS: Windows 10 pro version 20H2

KB/Mouse: Logitech G Pro Mechanical Gaming Keyboard / Razer Basilisk - Multi-color Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

CPU-Z validation link: https://valid.x86.fr/exy9cx

Cinebench R23 results: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/470992835777134604/800199582071521290/unknown.png

Pics: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/470992835777134604/797400853463564288/IMG_20210109_033451666.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/470992835777134604/797400868008755200/IMG_20210109_033544359.jpg

[xSOSxHawkens]

Bought an old machine off a friend that I originally built for him back in late 2013/early 2014. Paid a few hundred for it today, though back when it was built it was worth much more. Plan to put it to use as a Plex server. Needed a GPU. R/N It will have the listed one in it, but soon it will get a GTX 670 4GB and will able to be made use of as a 4th rate gaming rig if needed.

AMD FX 8350
16GB Corsair Dominator 1866 cl9
Corsair H105
Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Seagate 600 Series 480GB SSD
Seagate 2TB HDD
Toughpower Grand 850w
Pioneer Blueray Reader
Asus DVD burner.
NZXT Phantom case (White/red/black)
A 2.4ghz n300 wifi card.
Included Windows licence.
Current has an HD5770 in it from my backstock.
Had an old GTX650 2GB in it that I gave my friend, he let it die...
I gave it to him to replace the R9 290 it originally had... That he let die...

He had an odd habit of killing GPU's through neglecting to notice or do anything from fan failures... But the rest of the system never gave him issues.

Being that I plan to make it a plex machine, I think it will do the job nicely. My current one is an old Athlon II x4 with an OC and 6GB of ram, so this will be a large upgrade. My main things I was looking for that I new the machine would have would be a BR drive so I can encode my own collection to my plex library, like I am doing with my physical DVD collection. I also wanted a better CPU and better ram, and a decent PSU, all of which this build ticks.

[nE0n1nja]

My current setup, waiting for RTX 3060s to come out.

Processor & Cooler: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 3.40GHz & Cooler Master MasterAir G100M
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B450M-A
Storage: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250 GB NVMe SSD | WD10EZEX 1TB 7200 RPM HDD | WD Blue 1TB 5400RPM External HDD
PSU: Cooler Master MWE 500
RAM: 16GB Kingston HyperX FURY DDR4 @ 3200 MHz
Video card: GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 960 4GB Windforce x2 OC Edition
Case: Cooler Master MB520
Mouse: Genesis Xenon 210
Keyboard: Cooler Master CK530 Gateron Brown
Gamepad: Logitech F510
Audio: Logitech Z333 2.1 Speakers | Genesis Gaming Argon 200 Black Headphones
Monitor: Dell U2419H 24" + XP-Pen Artist 22 Pro + Philips 222EL1SB 22"
OS: Windows 10 Home x64

Picture on imgur: https://imgur.com/gallery/xdu1Lf6

[udidwht]

It works and works very well...no reason to upgrade.

Windows 10 Pro 20H2 19042.746
Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3
G-Skill 32GB DDR3 7-8-8-24
Intel i7- 3770K
Asus RTX 2070 OC 8GB
LG Blue Ray DL
Antec 650w
1TB Crucial MX-500 SSD
(x3) 1TB Mushkin SSDs
24in LED Samsung curved FHD
Ttesports keyboard commander Thermaltake
Rosewill mid tower challenger

[r.linder]

Messaggio originale di Hardware Hero™:

My PC:
https://valid.x86.fr/0p13dd

A detailed look at my GPU:
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/mb7u4

Runs like a champ!

Use Clock Tuner to get a better use of voltage and better clocks under load. You can input the result values into BIOS afterwards if your BIOS has CCX OC options, most do by now

My 3900X does 4.3 GHz on the first chiplet (2 CCXs) and 4.15 GHz on CCX3 and 4.2 GHz on the last CCX, at only 1.256v whereas at stock it's more like 4 GHz all core with 1.34+ volts.

[r.linder]

Messaggio originale di ⎠Zushikatetomoto⎝☢ ☠ ☢:

Messaggio originale di Escorve:

Use Clock Tuner to get a better use of voltage and better clocks under load. You can input the result values into BIOS afterwards if your BIOS has CCX OC options, most do by now

My 3900X does 4.3 GHz on the first chiplet (2 CCXs) and 4.15 GHz on CCX3 and 4.2 GHz on the last CCX, at only 1.256v whereas at stock it's more like 4 GHz all core with 1.34+ volts.

My 3800x clocks to 4.6ghz with no oc. just AMD PBO and the other one. On all cores.
ranges from 4.3ghz to 4.6ghz

Either you hit a silicon lottery jackpot among all 3800X samples, or you're reading it incorrectly because you're using HWinfo64 or HWMonitor and not Ryzen Master like you should be, because Ryzen Master is the only one not misreporting information.

Regardless, Clock Tuner has always resulted in better results than simple Precision Boost/Auto Overclocking because PBO just wastes voltage like any auto OC function. Guaranteed you can use less voltage, and realistically one shouldn't be using more than a 1.3v VID in a full load regardless because it's hazardous to TSMC's silicon due to the high current.

[r.linder]

Messaggio originale di ⎠Zushikatetomoto⎝☢ ☠ ☢:

Messaggio originale di Escorve:

Either you hit a silicon lottery jackpot among all 3800X samples, or you're reading it incorrectly because you're using HWinfo64 or HWMonitor and not Ryzen Master like you should be, because Ryzen Master is the only one not misreporting information.

Regardless, Clock Tuner has always resulted in better results than simple Precision Boost/Auto Overclocking because PBO just wastes voltage like any auto OC function. Guaranteed you can use less voltage, and realistically one shouldn't be using more than a 1.3v VID in a full load regardless because it's hazardous to TSMC's silicon due to the high current.

well it all depends how you tune the curve. not getting into details cause it differs from board to board.

It doesn't matter how you "tune the curve" when the FIT isn't going to allow what isn't safe, and guaranteed 99.9% of 3800X's aren't going to get what you're claiming with PBO. If you're not going to do anything to actually prove that your sample is getting that automatically with PBO, then my automatic assumption is that you're either lying or just mistaken, because the claim you're making is rarer than winning the powerball when every single person on the planet entered it.

Only around 20% of 3800X's have been able to do 4.3 all-core at 1.3 volts, and the voltage to frequency curve for Ryzen has always been pretty bad, because 100% of them can do 4.2 GHz at 1.275 volts. So look, an approximate 80% gap in likelihood of the bin getting even 4.3 with a tiny bit of voltage, is awful. The likelihood of someone getting a chip that can do 4.6 all core by itself is nothing short of a technological miracle for Zen2.




Example: https://valid.x86.fr/p14bp7 (1.256v VID set in BIOS, core voltage will be higher than what is set in BIOS because it's not the same stat despite it being displayed in Gigabyte BIOS as core voltage.) At stock and PBO config, 3900Xs will get worse clocks. The advertised turbo boost is a SINGLE CORE boost, not an all-core boost.

Quote from AMD's website for their Max Boost Clock: "Max boost for AMD processors is the maximum frequency achievable by a single core on the processor running a bursty single-threaded workload. Max boost will vary based on several factors, including, but not limited to: thermal paste; system cooling; motherboard design and BIOS; the latest AMD chipset driver; and the latest OS updates." PBO does not change this and neither does AutoOC. All they do is increase the amount time that the boost is sustained by raising the power limits (PPT, TDC, EDC) but is still limited by the Silicon Fitness (FIT) which protects the chip from damage automatically unless it is disabled manually, load, and temperature. Zen2 processors lose 25~75 MHz (depending on the lineup, 7 loses 50 MHz) every 10 degrees starting at 50 degrees Celsius.

TL;DR: Prove it. Nobody with even a scintilla of knowledge of how these processors work would believe that otherwise. Your claim doesn't represent any factual information on how these processors function out of the box, even Zen3 doesn't do this unless you use the Curve Optimiser on top of the newly improved PBO2, functions that are both limited to Zen3 processors.

[r.linder]

Messaggio originale di ⎠Zushikatetomoto⎝☢ ☠ ☢:

Messaggio originale di Escorve:

It doesn't matter how you "tune the curve" when the FIT isn't going to allow what isn't safe, and guaranteed 99.9% of 3800X's aren't going to get what you're claiming with PBO. If you're not going to do anything to actually prove that your sample is getting that automatically with PBO, then my automatic assumption is that you're either lying or just mistaken, because the claim you're making is rarer than winning the powerball when every single person on the planet entered it.

Only around 20% of 3800X's have been able to do 4.3 all-core at 1.3 volts, and the voltage to frequency curve for Ryzen has always been pretty bad, because 100% of them can do 4.2 GHz at 1.275 volts. So look, an approximate 80% gap in likelihood of the bin getting even 4.3 with a tiny bit of voltage, is awful. The likelihood of someone getting a chip that can do 4.6 all core by itself is nothing short of a technological miracle for Zen2.




Example: https://valid.x86.fr/p14bp7 (1.256v VID set in BIOS, core voltage will be higher than what is set in BIOS because it's not the same stat despite it being displayed in Gigabyte BIOS as core voltage.) At stock and PBO config, 3900Xs will get worse clocks. The advertised turbo boost is a SINGLE CORE boost, not an all-core boost.

Quote from AMD's website for their Max Boost Clock: "Max boost for AMD processors is the maximum frequency achievable by a single core on the processor running a bursty single-threaded workload. Max boost will vary based on several factors, including, but not limited to: thermal paste; system cooling; motherboard design and BIOS; the latest AMD chipset driver; and the latest OS updates." PBO does not change this and neither does AutoOC. All they do is increase the amount time that the boost is sustained by raising the power limits (PPT, TDC, EDC) but is still limited by the Silicon Fitness (FIT) which protects the chip from damage automatically unless it is disabled manually, load, and temperature. Zen2 processors lose 25~75 MHz (depending on the lineup, 7 loses 50 MHz) every 10 degrees starting at 50 degrees Celsius.

TL;DR: Prove it. Nobody with even a scintilla of knowledge of how these processors work would believe that otherwise. Your claim doesn't represent any factual information on how these processors function out of the box, even Zen3 doesn't do this unless you use the Curve Optimiser on top of the newly improved PBO2, functions that are both limited to Zen3 processors.

Messaggio originale di Escorve:

It doesn't matter how you "tune the curve" when the FIT isn't going to allow what isn't safe, and guaranteed 99.9% of 3800X's aren't going to get what you're claiming with PBO. If you're not going to do anything to actually prove that your sample is getting that automatically with PBO, then my automatic assumption is that you're either lying or just mistaken, because the claim you're making is rarer than winning the powerball when every single person on the planet entered it.

Only around 20% of 3800X's have been able to do 4.3 all-core at 1.3 volts, and the voltage to frequency curve for Ryzen has always been pretty bad, because 100% of them can do 4.2 GHz at 1.275 volts. So look, an approximate 80% gap in likelihood of the bin getting even 4.3 with a tiny bit of voltage, is awful. The likelihood of someone getting a chip that can do 4.6 all core by itself is nothing short of a technological miracle for Zen2.




Example: https://valid.x86.fr/p14bp7 (1.256v VID set in BIOS, core voltage will be higher than what is set in BIOS because it's not the same stat despite it being displayed in Gigabyte BIOS as core voltage.) At stock and PBO config, 3900Xs will get worse clocks. The advertised turbo boost is a SINGLE CORE boost, not an all-core boost.

Quote from AMD's website for their Max Boost Clock: "Max boost for AMD processors is the maximum frequency achievable by a single core on the processor running a bursty single-threaded workload. Max boost will vary based on several factors, including, but not limited to: thermal paste; system cooling; motherboard design and BIOS; the latest AMD chipset driver; and the latest OS updates." PBO does not change this and neither does AutoOC. All they do is increase the amount time that the boost is sustained by raising the power limits (PPT, TDC, EDC) but is still limited by the Silicon Fitness (FIT) which protects the chip from damage automatically unless it is disabled manually, load, and temperature. Zen2 processors lose 25~75 MHz (depending on the lineup, 7 loses 50 MHz) every 10 degrees starting at 50 degrees Celsius.

TL;DR: Prove it. Nobody with even a scintilla of knowledge of how these processors work would believe that otherwise. Your claim doesn't represent any factual information on how these processors function out of the box, even Zen3 doesn't do this unless you use the Curve Optimiser on top of the newly improved PBO2, functions that are both limited to Zen3 processors.

forget it I am not even going to prove it after hearing this but IDC if you don't believe me I even showed others. This comment "Ryzen Master is the only one not misreporting information."

Just forget it. Not here to fight.
Core 0 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 1 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 2 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 3 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 4 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 5 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 6 max ratio (effective) 45.5
Core 7 max ratio (effective) 45.5

You know you can do better than that. Anyone can type that and claim it to be true.