Share your computer setup!

[AVLNCH]

Do you have a speedy new system that you’d love to show off to the world? Perhaps you’re someone who just plays casually on the home PC? Why not post your setup in here to share & compare with other members of the Steam community!

[Pitz_Nous]

•••••• System Specs ••••••
CPU: Intel Core i7 8750h @ 4.1Ghz
MOBO: Laptop
RAM: 24gb Balistix 24mhz
GPU: GTX 1060
SSD: Samsung 256GB
SSD2: Crucial MX500 1tb
PSU: (Laptop 200W)
Case: Omen 15-2018 (Laptop)

•••••• Peripherals ••••••
Monitor: skillkorp 2560x1440 @144htz + Laptop 1920x1080 @144htz
Mousemat: Logitech G240
Keyboard: Logitech G552 lightspeed
Speakers: N/A
Headset: Corsair void pro wireless rgb

[big baby bobkitten]

well new page i got my 3rd one im sorry to spam or anything but my profile pic here has my junk pile im waiting to fill the big slot with a 200 though

[SHREDDER]

⎠Zushikatetomoto⎝☢ ☠ ☢ eredeti hozzászólása:

SHREDDER eredeti hozzászólása:

Mine is more nice! It is GTX 970 G1 GAMING. I have it since november 2014 but it still a beast. Since then i have upgraded evrything else but i kept it because it does it job perfectly! But yes nice GPU. How much did you paid for it ?

yours is old and not that nice in 2020 due to 3.5gb vram sadly and nvidia locking 0.5mb vram.
I know mine is more nicer. I do plan to get a ryzen 7 4700x and a x690 mobo.
If I tell you how much I paid and then get rtx 3080ti you will be like.........

I checked the price on the mostp popular shop on my country and the RTX 2080 super that you got costs 860 euros but the chepaer is the MSI VENTUS ar 720 euros. Why will you get X670 motherboard and mobo? We dont need it yet. I will only change the graphics card nothing more because all i need for max settings 1440p 60 fps in all games is a better graphics card. You also dont need to change motherboard and cpu because 2700x also runs max settings with more than 60 fps like 1700 does. So why waste your money on somethign that you dont realy need yet?

[mgeorgecook]

eh I cant spend the money for the greater gtx models let alone those new rtx ones my 960 gtx keeps pace with most of the modern ones with a generous ocing mine I find I only need 10 to 15% to hit 100 fps on high to cinema setting ( cinema is a game setting who figure). I am happy with it keeping me at 60 fps tho the human guy can not perceive faster than 32 fps so 60 is a overkill and a happy low for me.

[MonkehMaster]

mgeorgecook eredeti hozzászólása:

eh I cant spend the money for the greater gtx models let alone those new rtx ones my 960 gtx keeps pace with most of the modern ones with a generous ocing mine I find I only need 10 to 15% to hit 100 fps on high to cinema setting ( cinema is a game setting who figure). I am happy with it keeping me at 60 fps tho the human guy can not perceive faster than 32 fps so 60 is a overkill and a happy low for me.

utterly false, the human eye can see much more than you suggest, more so depending on each person and their eyes as well.

[r.linder]

mgeorgecook eredeti hozzászólása:

eh I cant spend the money for the greater gtx models let alone those new rtx ones my 960 gtx keeps pace with most of the modern ones with a generous ocing mine I find I only need 10 to 15% to hit 100 fps on high to cinema setting ( cinema is a game setting who figure). I am happy with it keeping me at 60 fps tho the human guy can not perceive faster than 32 fps so 60 is a overkill and a happy low for me.

The human eye can see much faster than 32 FPS. If 32 was the fastest, we wouldn't have 60Hz, 75Hz, 120Hz, 144Hz, 165Hz, and 240Hz monitors because there'd be no difference. You can clearly see a difference between even 60 and 75Hz, and the difference between 60 and 144 Hz is monumental.

[r.linder]

⎠Zushikatetomoto⎝☢ ☠ ☢ eredeti hozzászólása:

Escorve eredeti hozzászólása:

The human eye can see much faster than 32 FPS. If 32 was the fastest, we wouldn't have 60Hz, 75Hz, 120Hz, 144Hz, 165Hz, and 240Hz monitors because there'd be no difference. You can clearly see a difference between even 60 and 75Hz, and the difference between 60 and 144 Hz is monumental.

agreed the human eye can see greater fps then 60 too.

When I actually get my 240Hz monitor, I'll do some tests to see where the actual limit of the human eye is, at least when it comes to me. One person will not necessarily see the same exact way as another.

[MonkehMaster]

Escorve eredeti hozzászólása:

⎠Zushikatetomoto⎝☢ ☠ ☢ eredeti hozzászólása:

agreed the human eye can see greater fps then 60 too.

When I actually get my 240Hz monitor, I'll do some tests to see where the actual limit of the human eye is, at least when it comes to me. One person will not necessarily see the same exact way as another.

not sure if its the case, but wondering if having monitors that run specific hertz would be a better test than 1 that can run them all, think they may be tuned specifically to run their specified hertz.

just a thought when you mentioned testing the subject.

[mgeorgecook]

well it not false that being said yes our brain can and does process more that said The human eye can not do better than 32 or we have no need for 3d glasses as that is 2 images in most cases running 120 fps or more to give the 3d pop we all see with the glasses. People who can say they can have no understanding on how the eye relays optical info to the brain...now a cybernetic eye could but we ant talking augments which are not feasible anyway. So yes the brain can theoretically go faster and see more but our human parts wont handle such speed.
so that being said and having a fairly good understanding of the human mind not having a functional cerebellum due to a rare genetic defect I would know better and do so the arguments are moot. May you guys learn some humility and cease your dragging people down or saying they can without understanding their difficulties etc. thought this was a simple here what my rig is what you got....not keeping up with the joneses.

[Earth]

MY POTATO PC SPECS:
Computer Information:
Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
Model: Latitude E6410
Form Factor: Laptop
No Touch Input Detected

Processor Information:
CPU Vendor: GenuineIntel
CPU Brand: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU M 620 @ 2.67GHz
CPU Family: 0x6
CPU Model: 0x25
CPU Stepping: 0x2
CPU Type: 0x0
Speed: 2660 Mhz
4 logical processors
2 physical processors
HyperThreading: Supported
FCMOV: Supported
SSE2: Supported
SSE3: Supported
SSSE3: Supported
SSE4a: Unsupported
SSE41: Supported
SSE42: Supported
AES: Supported
AVX: Unsupported
AVX2: Unsupported
AVX512F: Unsupported
AVX512PF: Unsupported
AVX512ER: Unsupported
AVX512CD: Unsupported
AVX512VNNI: Unsupported
SHA: Unsupported
CMPXCHG16B: Supported
LAHF/SAHF: Supported
PrefetchW: Unsupported

Operating System Version:
Windows 10 (64 bit)
NTFS: Supported
Crypto Provider Codes: Supported 311 0x0 0x0 0x0

Video Card:
Driver: Intel(R) HD Graphics
DirectX Driver Name: igdumdx32.dll
Driver Version: 8.15.10.2900
DirectX Driver Version: 8.15.10.2900
Driver Date: 11 26 2012
OpenGL Version: 1.1
Desktop Color Depth: 32 bits per pixel
Monitor Refresh Rate: 59 Hz
DirectX Card: Intel(R) HD Graphics
VendorID: 0x8086
DeviceID: 0x46
Revision: 0x2
Number of Monitors: 1
Number of Logical Video Cards: 1
No SLI or Crossfire Detected
Primary Display Resolution: 1280 x 800
Desktop Resolution: 1280 x 800
Primary Display Size: 11.93" x 7.48" (14.06" diag)
30.3cm x 19.0cm (35.7cm diag)
Primary Bus Type Not Detected
Primary VRAM: 1754 MB
Supported MSAA Modes Not Detected

Sound card:
Audio device: Speakers / Headphones (IDT High

Memory:
RAM: 3957 Mb

VR Hardware:
VR Headset: None detected

Miscellaneous:
UI Language: English
Media Type: DVD
Total Hard Disk Space Available: 237690 Mb
Largest Free Hard Disk Block: 1171 Mb
OS Install Date: Dec 31 1969
Game Controller: None detected
MAC Address hash: bc3a5129efe90b435e4b37fbcde44806e06b5894
Disk serial number hash: 9d31a5ea

[IBM_Carbine]

Alienware M15
Disk space: 1.5 TB (512GB PCIe M.2 NVMe Class 40 Solid State Drive and 1TB Solid State Hybrid Drive (5400 RPM) with 8 GB Flash)
- Intel Core 9th Generation i7-9750H Processor (6 Core, Up to 4.50Ghz, 12MB Cache, 45W)
- 16GB (2x8GB) 2666MHz DDR4 Non-ECC
- Windows 64 Bit (Home)
- FHD Camera
- 6-Cell, 90 WHr Battery (Integrated)
- NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 2060 6GB GDDR6 (OC Ready)
- Epic Silver - LCD Back Cover (Non-Touch)
- Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650 (2x2) and Bluetooth 5.0
- Alienware AlienFX mSeries Keyboard with Alphanumeric Keys
- 240 Watt AC Adapter
- Power Cord 125V

[Mr. Hubble]

System Spec's:
OS: Win 10 64 bit
MB: MSI Z97-G45 GAMING.
PSU: 1200 watt
CPU Intel(R)Core(TM) i7 4790k 5.0 gig
Western Digital 6 TB Hard Drive 256 megs of cache
Mem: Corsair Vengeance 32 GB
GPU: Gigabyte GTX 1080 ti card.
Microsoft split ergo keyboard.
Logitech G-700 wireless mouse
Q-LED Samsung 65" Curved Screen Smart TV
Sound system: Dennon AVR - X3500H , 7.2 ch 4K Receiver. Two Acoustech PL 980 3-way, six driver tower speakers. Frequency Response: 22Hz-23kHz Sensitivity: 98dB Drivers: Each tower has two high power 8" active woofers, two 8" passive woofers, one enclosed 5" midrange, and one 6 1/2" mid/high frequency aluminum dome horn with neodymium magnet. Magnetic Shielding: YES Gold-Plated Terminals: YES. Recommended Power: 10-300 watts per channel RMS, 750 watts peak power ,with Fluance surround bookshelf speakers with base shakers mounted in my chair. My sound system is dynamite for Gaming or Movies.

[Hare+Guu!]

Was curious how much I've spent, so I plugged the current setup in pcpartpicker:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/28hsf9
Around 3k apparently. Even more since I didn't build this one from scratch. It's a slow migration from an i5, then 1st gen ryzen, into this.

[Spec_Ops_Ape]

More changes. New kit of RAM (watercooled) and new pump, much quieter than the 2 DDC pumps I swapped out.

https://valid.x86.fr/j1bd6r
ASUS Rog Crosshair VIII Hero WIFI
Ryzen 5 3600 @4.4GHz all core 1.32v
G-Skill Flare X (F4-2933C14D-16GFX) @ 3600MHz c15 1.48v
Gigabyte Radeon VII
EVGA SupaNova 1000 G2
500GB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 NVMe drive (Win 10, Games)
2TB Intel 660p M.2 NVMe drive (games)
60GB OCZ 2.5" SSD
3x Phanteks 140mm fans (Front intakes)
1x Corsair ML120 (Rear exhaust)
Phanteks Enthoo Luxe II

Custom water loop
EK Supremacy Classic AM4 waterblock
EK RAM Monarch block
EKWB Full cover Radeon VII waterblock
EKWB Radeon VII backplate
EKWB SE360 Radiator (Side mount)
EKWB SE240 (Bottom mount)
EK D5 pump
XSPC 10K Inline Temp Sensor
5x Corsair ML120 fans (plugged into the cases PWM fan hub and tuned to inline temp sensor)

Acer VG271U monitor (27", 1440p, 144Hz, IPS panel)
Logitech G602 mechanical keyboard
Logitech G402 mouse
Logitech X52 H.O.T.A.S
Logitech Flight Pedals
Creative Inspire T6300 5.1 speakers

[Spec_Ops_Ape]

My "Battlestation"
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2104635146
Been doing a lot of memory overclocking the past couple of weeks so have a small TV hooked up to my Chromecast and stream movies from my phone to watch while running memory stress tests.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2104635945
More memory overclocking yesterday/last night I'm now at 3733MHz 15-15-15-30-1T @1.49v
https://valid.x86.fr/zupk8e
I can get 3800MHz c16 on the RAM but the R5 3600 won't do 1900fclk, system won't post no matter what. If I do 1866fclk and 1900mclk I take a hit to latency by around 8ns. I'm tempted to see how far I can push the RAM out of curiosity.