安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
此主题已被置顶，因此可能具有重要性 
讨论规则及指引
68 
举报此帖
https://imgur.com/a/QJye8th
I guess it doesn't look as bad as I thought after actually taking the picture of it, but I remember being a bit disappointed with it and feeling like it was messy before. I did remove two storage drives though so it had more mess to it before. I learned how quick a few extra hard drives add up to cables, so I can't imagine things like a bunch of extra devices and therefore can't say anything about, say, Dober's looking bad. I'd probably do worse in that situation.
I doubt the airflow or temperatures are impacted to a meaningful extent with the example Shredder posted though. People tend to greatly underestimate what is needed to truly cause that.
It's mostly for looks and general care-taking that people do it (and because modern cases easily accommodate it, and as of late have been putting more emphasis on aesthetic and presentation on the inside with the prevalence of things like windows and lighting).
While it looks dusty and has no cable detours, and I agree he'd do well to take better care of it if he holds it in the high regards he seems to, he's probably not increasing his temperatures much if any with the cables the way they are.
Not too strange given your uses (video editing and media hosting). If you don't have a network with many users and/or devices that need to access that same content from different devices in different places, then it makes sense to just add it to the lone existing device that'd be hosting it rather than have a separate NAS for it.
I have on a measly 19 TB in comparison, 14 TB being internal and 5 TB being external for backup, though some of that is just "copied" data for redundancy so it's really less usable space (I recently dropped 2x 640 GB drives which weren't adding much anyway so I'm down to a single SSD and three HDDs internally).
I am in line on GPU I max 2.1and I dont want to oc mem much and I see most hit 2.1 max gpu and as mem most 500-600 maybe water better
No need to oc but its in line like all my benchmarks
Nice! The Obsidian 1000D is a case I admire. I'm on the lookout for a PC case that will give me a lot of options.
no need for new anything...
wrong..
depends on the games the person is playing, also the person may not want to upgrade those parts.
Target refresh rate/GPU utilisation.
Resolution/Graphics settings.
Game or program in question.
What's happening in said game or program.
Bottleneck isn't some mystical force.
And it can vary in how much of it there is.
It doesn't really matter so long as the user is fine with the performance.
Interesting if this becomes a thing since a typical motherboard runs a single CPU as opposed to mining on multi GPUs on a single pc demand and scarcity will also go up for motherboards memory and power supply units. None of the pc hardware will be untouched by mining. Well SSD mining hasn't taken off yet.
He is playing on a 4K display so the bottleneck will be very limited. And with the 4770K at 4.7Ghz, he will mostly only see bottleneck at 1440p or 1080p. When I had my 3070Ti coupled with my 4770K at 4.4Ghz, I did see some bottleneck, but really only when I ran benchmarks that were at 1080p or 1440p. In 4K gaming, I got pretty much the same FPS that I get now with my 10700K and 3070Ti. Place where I did see some bottleneck at 4K though were in CPU intensive games like GTA5, and CPU intensive scenarios, in otherwise GPU limited games, where I would get microstutter.
So, obviously, even at 4K my 4770K bottenecked my 3070Ti enough that I wanted to upgrade CPU, but it was very limited and depending on the person, could be very acceptable. And the 3070Ti is a bit more powerful than the 2080Ti(though not by much), so with a 4770K at 4.7Ghz he might not see as much bottleneck with his 2080Ti as I saw with my 3070Ti and 4770K at 4.4Ghz.
Just on a side note though, the 10700K still bottlenecks my 3070Ti at 1080p a bit. But nowadays, 1080p is very CPU limited as opposed to being GPU limited. At 1440p and above, however, there is no bottleneck and I see the full potential of my 3070Ti. Which is what that card was designed for anyway.
Intel hd 3000
4gb ram
Windows 10 21H1 64x
CPU: i9-12900k
CPU Cooler: EK-Quantum Velocity²
MB: Asus Rog Maximus Z690 Apex
RAM: 32GB Trident Z5
DDR5-6000MHz CL36
GPU: Asus Rog Strix OC 3090
GPU Cooler: Aqua Computer Kryographics Next
CASE: Corsair 1000D
FANS: 35x Lian Li SL Uni Fan
PUMP/RES: 2x D5 Next + 2x Heatkiller Tube 250
RAD: 4x480 Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 V2
Lol,small upgrade those fans alone would run me over $1200 Cdn for that many of them. How are those fans by the way?
I like them, nice sync rgb stuff, a lot less cables and decent airflow.
why 35 of them? can you actually fit all them in that case?
for a dual system, i was thinking the wp200 (w200 + p200) tyhe case isnt pretty, but it has room for 2 full size pc's plus the extension (p200) with added drive bays, tho personally i think having that extra space for maybe a small server would be nice, tho they dont have the mounting for that in it.
4 x 480 mm radiators. Assuming 4 120 mm fans per rad that accounts for half? Push - pull configuration?
1000D is a super tower :)