Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php
Take everything you read with a grain of salt. Also game benchmarks might not really be all that accurate because driver updates and updates to the games may change the figures. Some of the new games they use may have problems or poor optimization for PC. Generally a good brand new gaming PC should get over 60 FPS in all current games on high settings.
For that reason I'd prefer to use synthetic benchmarks, specially since AMD usually seems to receive optimizations later than Intel according to the game benchmarks I see.
I have a AMD and everything runs at it's FPS cap.
I also like these guys but I think their higher end video card benchmarks might be messed up in terms of more than just Crossfire and SLI. For example HD 6950 should benchmark over 10 times higher than the HD 7840D A4 APU IGP but for some reason it's only getting a score of around 3000~ while the HD 7480D and intel HD 4000 both get 460-465 points. The performance statistics of the HD 6950 are like 10 times or more better in every single way so you'd think it should be scoring like 4600+ but that is not the case. Either the benchmarks are not scaling in a normal 1 point = 1 fixed amount of power or else they are having some trouble accurately measuring the higher end cards.
No benchmarks are perfect remember.