安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
COOLER MASTER Seidon 120M RL-S12M-24PK-R1 Performance All in One Liquid/Water CPU Cooler
Upgrade model available, click for details
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835103179
It's entry level, but it would get the job done and keep the heat out of the case.
All total after the rebate it would be the same price as your i3 build and better for gaming. That is what I'd do for myself for the same money if it absolutely had to be mini-ITX.
Here check this out; $220 after $25 rebate, same price as your i3+motherboard:
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1fMqs
esp if he wants to upgrade to a better cpu in the future
the board he picked, will take teh 3570k and can oc it to 4.5+ with a liquid cooler
Take a 1TB HDD, they are barely few bucks more expensive than 500Gb, but have double the cappacity.
I'd suggest caviar Black or Red, but Blue will do the job fine (just avoid green).
For the board and CPU, if you decide to go with AMD, ITX is out of the question and even their mATX mobos are lackluster, so with AMD you will be stuck with full sized ATX.
With a 6300 your only real upgrade option would be 8350 which is comparable to 3570K.
With LGA1155, you upgrade options later should be either 3570K or 3770K.
The i3 is not better.
Every time you start talking about the i5 like as if someone is going to run out and buy a i3 and 6 months later going to replace it with a i5.
By the time he replaces it it is going to be a dead and obsolete socket unless Intel does something they never (as far as I know) have done before and re-uses it in a subsequent generation.
replacing the i3+board will cost more than replacing the Athlon x4 750K + board and at least he will get to keep the CPU cooler.
Face it, if he buys the i3 he is never going to go out and buy a i5-3570K, unless of course the i3 sucked so badly that he couldn't do the things he wanted with it.
The Athlon x4 750K is already a quad-core like the i5-3570K, it's overclockable, it's just as fast at 3.4ghz vs 3.4ghz and it boosts higher to 4ghz with all 4 cores. While the i5-3570K only boosts to 3.8ghz on one single core and the other cores boost lower or not at all.
He might feel like he needs a upgrade with the i3, he won't feel like that with the Athlon x4 750K, at least not until the i5-3570K would be obsolete and either bad value or just plain unavailable.
If he was building a computerized cash register at a grocery store I would be pushing i3 using integrated graphics and no discrete GPU all the way. He wants to build a gaming machine though and for that the Athlon x4 750K is currently the better choice.
I was always told GPU>CPU and the difference from the CPU price could then be sunk into a better GPU or some games or you know whatever the OP wants.
Incase you want to put a cheap 95w FX6300 into a $29 merc alpha case and be further ahead that's the comparison ^.
i3 just doesn't cut it across the board for it's premium price.
http://www.techspot.com/review/670-metro-last-light-performance/page6.html
Seriously not, i3 3220 with a titan doesn't break 57fps.
The board OP is picking has no sense in putting any future K version to overclock at all, that board simply won't do it.
I don't know why the fixation of i3 is so entrenched, if fps is important FX6300 and the most you can afford for a vid card is the only way to go.
http://www.techspot.com/review/670-metro-last-light-performance/page3.html
So there's no misunderstanding there's the 7850 down with GTX560ti ^. 40fps avg at 1680x1050 and that's on a cpu that bests the i3 3220 so knock another 10-12 fps off that.