All Discussions > Steam Forums > Hardware and Operating Systems > Topic Details
オナニー Jan 18 @ 6:28am
Upscaling and frame gen
I think both these techs are the future for high refresh rate fps on portables.
When devs stop being lazy.

solid opinion?' bad?

rate /5

Something went wrong while displaying this content. Refresh

Error Reference: Community_9721151_
Loading CSS chunk 7561 failed.
(error: https://community.fastly.steamstatic.com/public/css/applications/community/communityawardsapp.css?contenthash=789dd1fbdb6c6b5c773d)
Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
Wichtelman Jan 18 @ 7:26am 
i think both are terrible how they are used and same story for raytracing or pathtracing... they should be great but they are not... cashgrab...
#1
Quint Jan 18 @ 5:53pm 
Why would you want your opinion rated? 20/25
#2
A&A Jan 18 @ 6:17pm 
Well, we can render light sources perfectly realistically, but we can't render the whole scene at native 8K.

Amazing :D
#3
Bing Chilling Jan 18 @ 8:50pm 
i don't mind upscaling, but framegen adds a decent amount of latency.
ok for singleplayer games but awful for anything multiplayer

i do wish tho that games didn't NEED to use upscaling because devs are using it as a crutch in alot of cases.
#4
ybg Moli Jan 19 @ 9:37am 
i like upscaling, but frame gen (at least for now) isnt that great, as @Bing Chilling said, it introduces a noticeable ammount latency.
I dont mind using it with handhealds, i actually played Cp2077 with FSR 3.1 FG and i had a great experience. But on desktop PCs, our hardware should be enough to run these new games.

I love the upscalers tho, i honestly cant differentiate dlss quality and native res, can see some artifacts in balanced mode but i have to look for them, not noticeable in game imo.
#5
Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Hardware and Operating Systems > Topic Details
Date Posted: Jan 18 @ 6:28am
Posts: 5
Start a New Discussion

Discussions Rules and Guidelines