Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2K_resolution
2048x1080
I think people don't want to be rude or picky, ignore the mistake assuming 2K =1440p and let the wrong belief to spread
1440p is "QHD"
i had 2 OLED monitors that i got for cheap used.....i ended up selling them for more then i paid and bought my current monitor....
You shouldn't compare a mid range IPS to an OLED. You should compare a top of the range IPS to an OLED. When you do that, the price isn't all that different.
I have a very expensive IPS sat next to an equally expensive OLED and the picture quality is similar, but no doubt about it, the OLED is better. It's much smoother and the picture quality is just amazing. On the negative side, there is the danger of burn-in and text fringing on the OLED.
I certainly wouldn't consider mid-range. The picture quality of a mid-range IPS gaming monitor is poor compared to any top-range monitor.
Your problem is that you got cheap used oleds as a baseline to compare it with.
Compare any 300-400$ IPS vs OLED screen and the IPS will win 9/10 hands down.
Compare any +-1000$ IPS vs OLED screen and the OLED will win without contest.
I can never go back to non-OLED screens, the loss in color richness is just not acceptable anymore.
ASUS ROG swifts are not cheap monitors......me picking them up for 400 bucks for the pair was the cheap part......there 1200 US each right now on newegg.....i live near rich people that dont care....like being handed a 3080 for FREE when i upgraded someone to a 4090......i got the monitors when someone else went to a pair of 43inchers that i ended up calibrating leading to me getting the monitors.....
i would never hold on to a OLED knowing what i can sell it for......ive seen the best....its not worth the costs.....guy with the 4090 has a samsung G9 OLED.....would never pay that much for so little upgrade......you also dont understand the fact i had these monitors on my system side by side with mine to say its not worth the money given the hardware it changes in most budgets.....built the system and had the monitor and system at the house to calibrate it when he got the 4090(return customers are the best)
IF YOU CAN THROW MONEY AWAY then buy OLED.......but when i have someone sitting in front of me with a 2000 dollar budget we cant blow a 1000 bucks on the monitor.....even a 500 dollar monitor is a problem now given current costs of GPU's.....
calibrating a 300 to 500 dollar monitor will get you really close to out of the box OLED.....but most people dont even own the calibration tools.....if have unlimited funds by all means buy OLED as its truly are the best.....but not the crazy amount people make it out to be.....calibrating a monitor changes everything
It is for easier marketing purposes because the majority of people only read (and think) up to 4th (maybe 6th) grade level.
It's not the color it's the contrast, pixel response time & HDR performance. Sure OLEDS come with a nice wide gamut 10-12 bit panels but OLED colors drift over time which is not an issue for IPS for example. typically the 10 bit IPS panels have more accurate and neutral colors than OLED, and don't need to be re-calibrated with time.
IPS cant do black or 0 nit brightness and so looks silver hahaha this is ugly and only the bezel is black on an ips display lolz. IPS has no glossy glass screens as options and makes it further look flat and grey/silver.