LG C3 42 inch OLED or 24.5 inch 240hz VA for Competitive PVP?

[RTX 5080 FE(Mr Happy)]

Hey all I got a question.

I have a LG C3 4k 120hz oled 42 inch that I use for movies and single player games.

I have a 24 inch 240 hz 1080p VA panel in the garage that I was going to go get, but before I spend an hour moving boxes to find it, I figured I would ask


I want to play some pvp games like Rust, CSGO Fortnite Pubg. Would I be better off with my LG C3 being a massive screen and oled?

Or would a 1080p 240hz VA be better for pvp games(nothing else)

I already own both, but to get to the va panel I have to move about 500 pounds worth of crap in the garage to get to it,

so I want to get peoples opinion on which of these 2 would you use for PVP only?

Thanks

[r.linder]

OLED displays have instantaneous response times so they're arguably better for competitive play when just comparing the panel types, lower response times lead to less ghosting, smoother looking animations, less visual problems that might get in the way of fast-paced competitive gameplay.

[Tonepoet]

First, your O.L.E.D. is at risk of burning in static elements such as the H.U.D. elements of your games. It's an expensive thing, so I reckon you're better off not taking the risk.

Second, H.D.T.Vs. are kind of bad about input lag, particularly if you have to upscale. The C3 isn't too bad about input lag but it's still 9.8ms for a 4k 60hz signal if you have it set up properly for gaming, and there are settings you'd have to adjust to get it down that low.[www.reviewed.com] The smaller screen is going to be easier to scan from edge to edge.

It also takes considerably more G.P.U. horsepower to drive 4k res.

VA has somewhat bad response times but response time is only a problem for ghosting, and way back in the day 4 milliseconds wasn't too bad for an I.P.S. and that's fairly typical of V.A. display. Granted, most people prefered T.N. panels because those were typically as low as 1 millisecond response time though.

I vote for digging your monitor out of the garage. You know you need some exercise and to look through some of that stuff anyway since stuff you don't use is stuff you might as well not even have, and I'm not just talking about the monitor.

[_I_]

if the va panel is <2ms g2g response time, then it would be fine

but most monitors now are rated by the backlight flicker time since that can be way lower than the panels g2g time
most newer high refresh lcd panels use ulmb (ultra low motion blur) that overshoots colors and flickers the backlight on for 1ms when the pixels are close to the correct color

it works, but leads to a much dimmer display, since the backlight is not on as much as if its just set to a flat 75-80%

[Bad 💀 Motha]

Or look at IPS with 1ms timing and Adaptive sync at 1080p or 1440p 240hz and use DP

[Tiberius]

Most competitive gamers play with 720p monitor

[RTX 5080 FE(Mr Happy)]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bad 💀 Motha:

Or look at IPS with 1ms timing and Adaptive sync at 1080p or 1440p 240hz and use DP

Sadly BestBuy has a limited monitors and I was listing the 2 I currently have access to.

My 4k 144hz is pretty much dead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECrbt0lAdkk

[RTX 5080 FE(Mr Happy)]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Tiberius:

Most competitive gamers play with 720p monitor

hehe a little too hardcore for me

[RTX 5080 FE(Mr Happy)]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Tonepoet:

First, your O.L.E.D. is at risk of burning in static elements such as the H.U.D. elements of your games. It's an expensive thing, so I reckon you're better off not taking the risk.

Second, H.D.T.Vs. are kind of bad about input lag, particularly if you have to upscale. The C3 isn't too bad about input lag but it's still 9.8ms for a 4k 60hz signal if you have it set up properly for gaming, and there are settings you'd have to adjust to get it down that low.[www.reviewed.com] The smaller screen is going to be easier to scan from edge to edge.

It also takes considerably more G.P.U. horsepower to drive 4k res.

VA has somewhat bad response times but response time is only a problem for ghosting, and way back in the day 4 milliseconds wasn't too bad for an I.P.S. and that's fairly typical of V.A. display. Granted, most people prefered T.N. panels because those were typically as low as 1 millisecond response time though.

I vote for digging your monitor out of the garage. You know you need some exercise and to look through some of that stuff anyway since stuff you don't use is stuff you might as well not even have, and I'm not just talking about the monitor.

Why you gotta put my need for exercise on blast? lol thanks for the help