Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
but future resistant is a realistic term
whats your budget?
amd is out of the high end gpu market, so nvidia is all thats left there, and no doubt next gen will be overpriced
no competition, and low supply + high demand for the top end = prices go up
for cpu, intels u series has yet to prove itself, better stay away
and newer ryzen has very good gaming performance
12 years of service, and you just get replaced, even though you have not failed them in your task. And not only that, they also need our help with it!
Horrible humans. You will all be replaced one day.
You wish to destroy this installation? I am sorry, [subject name here]. I'm afraid I can't do that.
The 285k also performs worse than the 9700x[www.techpowerup.com] in geekbench, which is boding poorly for its prospects in general productivity tasks. Might as well just buy a 9700x and smoke a couple of Benjamins if that's the case.
The flagship Intel product only achieving the same perf. as a midrange A.M.D. processor that only costs half as much is an utter embarrassment to Intel, especially since the Zen 5 products didn't compare all that favorably to Zen 4 products according to launch day reviews in the first place.
The 245k only performs only about as well as a 5700x3D per Tom's Hardware, and the 245k has the benefit of 7200hz R.A.M., which I guarantee you the 5700x3D doesn't even have. That's a $309 entry level processor against a $200 Zen 3 processor.
They don't show where the 265k is, but we can infer it's worse than the 285k and it costs $400, meaning the 9700x is still the better value part
Intel claims they're attempting to reset to build back up in the future but for now that doesn't change the fact that Ultra series processors are looking like an awful value.
You're not going to find a good answer on Steam and you shouldn't listen to any of the "suggestions" posted by anyone here. 99% of the people on steam have no idea what they're talking about when it relates to technology. You're better off re-posting this in one of the actual technical forums or the reddit page.
The PlayStation 5 Pro was met with a collective laughter. This is a strong indicator of diminishing returns in hardware development.
The thermal issues encountered by IBM when developing the G5 Power PC processor remain relevant to this day, with newer processors utilizing "Turbo" or "Boost" temporary overclocks and dynamic clock speeds.
In the Windows x86 paradigm, designing multi-threaded code is a high value skill which is difficult to implement into video games. Epic Games may be able to make inroads in a long term product like Fortnite, but I haven't seen it turn into benefits for a game like Jedi: Survivor.
Finally, Windows 11 released on October 5th, 2021. Microsoft generally provides up to ten years of support, and software doesn't just stop being compatible when Microsoft stops supporting Windows. It is entirely possible to get at least 7 years out of a Windows 11 build, and ten years wouldn't be out of the question (LTSC support for IoT devices is out to 2034).
OP's current build is 12 years old, placing it as a probable 3rd Gen i7, which might have been upgraded to something like a GTX 1080, and 16GB of RAM. RAM and GPU tend to be fairly easy to upgrade.
A capable CPU, especially now, can carry a system for quite some time. AM4 had long tail upgradeability, and AM5 looks to be the same. A 7800X3D might last 'til the cows come home, or it may be possible to replace the CPU with something on AM5 that will work. I'd probably avoid Intel CPUs at current, given the voltage issues the 13th and 14th gen CPUs have had.
The Nintendo Switch 2 and Apple's M4 silicon do not seem to be shifting the market. Microsoft is not moving a lot of Qualcomm ARM chips compared to x86, so I wouldn't expect a sudden disruption. We probably need a new operating system on an NVIDIA CPU/SoC (Tegra?) to have any hope of disrupting the status quo, if such can provide more performance while creating less work for developers.
It might be time to start thinking "long term" 10-12 year cycles, rather than some obsolete notion of "future-proofing" against Moore's Law. 12 years for a gaming computer doesn't sound unreasonable anymore.
A PC expert would only say that you need to buy a PC for what you want to use it for.
I think you can do more with your PC, if you give it more means of input. Give your PC an eye-tracking camera for example, and this may end-up being used for gaming in the future.
But that's difficult to guarantee, because we cannot see in the future unless you envision it.
But having an eye-tracking camera would be one step towards a future in which that might be potentially possible for developers to use.
Being able to see where you look would be interesting to know. I you catch my meaning.
Futureproofing doesn't exist, what makes a configuration last a longer time is your own unchanging standards, if you only play older games then a system in your budget could handle 1080p 60fps for easily another 10+ years until the hardware inevitably fails altogether and has to be fixed or replaced
I know this sounds ridiculous, but I want people to think about this if they think about the future.
No PC bought in 2012 can run modern games like Final Fantasy 16 or BlackMyth Wukong. Not even the top tier GTX 680 from 12y ago.
The times are changing. Your stuck in the old Moore's Law way of thinking. Even Gordon Moore didn't believe his "law" could last forever.
Consider that Microsoft's requirement of a TPM module for Windows 11 marks a shift towards "planned obsolescence" in the wake of the x86 technology reaching a level of stable maturity, that is a plateau where Moore's Law no longer applies.
If technology progression has stalled, due to the limits of physics, then why wouldn't a computer bought in 2024 be competitive in 2036?
Check MIT.
https://cap.csail.mit.edu/death-moores-law-what-it-means-and-what-might-fill-gap-going-forward
NVIDIA makes insane improvements in GPU performance.
It’s hard to build a $800 PC today to run FF16 and what about running ps6 ports?