Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The pricing being the same, five years later, is another clue this isn't "meant" for consumers. The OEMs will likely not be buying it at that price and will get a volume discount. It obviously wouldn't be "worth it" at that on-the-books price.
So yes, it's silly that "Comet Lake is being released in 2025", but it's probably more of a nothing-burger due to what its real purpose most likely is.
New Core 5 is more than fine for mum and dad or office Dell PC's rather than scrapping it.
The thing is.. what purpose this CPU actually serves?
Cause instead of paying that premium for the rebranded 10400. the i3 14100 costs less and will be a much better product for that segment of the market
Yes, it will be 4 cores/8 threads but most applications that office PCs use will benefit far more from having much higher single core performance instead of having 2 more cores. if anything the increase in IPC will offset that core count difference
The Core i3 14100 is $110 (Micro Center) or between $120 to $130 (elsewhere).
The Ryzen 5 5500 might be a better comparison because it's the same core count and is closer in core performance. It's only slightly faster than the 3600X... which is a relatively close comparison to the 10400. The 5500 is ~$75 on Amazon sold by a third party (but AM4 is drying up so I don't know how reliable of a marker that is).
So it could be closer to half the listed price that OEMs would pay, give or take, but it's really hard to make guesses for volume OEM deals based on retail pricing of single boxed CPUs. For example, these would likely be sold by the tray and might come without cooling (OEMs may use their own cost cutting replacement for that), so they might be even cheaper.
But in short, there probably isn't a premium or else they wouldn't have appeal.
For the consumer market, if these show up at MSRP, they are of course not worth choosing.
Intel is just going backwards again
if so, thats messed up
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3568576831
The AMD ryzen Z2 is actually a rebranded Z1E, the Z2A is actually rebranded & slightly overclock chip from the steam deck (also confused by many as the higher performing Ryzen Z2 aka Z1E), and none of them share even the same generation of cpu gpu
the vanilla 110 is not listed, but many u/ul/hl variants are
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/236798/intel-core-processors-series-1.html
the i5 10505 is faster
Remember when they mocked AMD’s “glued together” chiplets? Oh, the irony—now they’re embracing the very same approach themselves.