安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Keep coping, shill. Maybe the leather jacket man will give you a pat on the back for many years of blind servitude to a brand that doesn't give a ♥♥♥♥ about you. Literally any time GPUs are mentioned, you're screeching about NVIDIA vs AMD. Nobody freaking cares, the masses only care about performance per dollar, of which AMD easily wins.
And then all of a sudden running modern engines with proper software support
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHzcdr3wL3E
the RTX 3060 Ti and the RX 6700 XT are even at ray tracing in 1080p - if you like to play at below 60 FPS on your 400 USD entry/budget card.
If one runs Windows, is this something hardware-accelerated gpu scheduling can address?
https://www.makeuseof.com/windows-10-gpu-hardware-scheduling-worth-turning-on/
By the way, I experimented w/ this b/c my processor is not an ideal match for my NV gpu and tried it for one day. I perceived a slight, general slowdown so I disabled it.
Edit: you're not supposed to notice anything if this is enabled but I did. Just an idea. Maybe it works for others.
https://www.gpucheck.com/compare/amd-radeon-rx-6700-xt-vs-nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-ti/intel-core-i9-10900k-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz/ Nowhere near 20%.
Did you get this off userbench or something? Cuz post number one has video proof this is flat out wrong.
Im not re-watching it again but if I remember correctly the RX took the win in FPS in all but one game? It didnt take huge wins, they are similar cards, but of the two the 2080ti is the slower one more often than not. No where near 20-50% better...
The problem there though is it can all come down to drivers sometimes too. But also with regards to DLSS, this has a DLL usually in the game folder. The version of the DLSS DLL file can dictate the overall quality of the DLSS in the game.
Oh really?
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-2080-Ti-vs-AMD-RX-6750-XT/4027vsm1845738
I would trust userbenchmark a million times more than any random clickbait YT link and clip..
This YT video clip doesnt even show real settings set. Not to mention any settings shown out of the nvidia control panel and that amd control panel. And what about GPU drivers? Are these been latest?
Anyone favors either nvidia or amd crap.. if customers or even benchmark devs.
If players want "reliable stuff", stick to nvidia and intel.
Also just check Steam's Hardware Survey.
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam
~76% use Nvidia GPU
~15% use AMD unstable experimentals
Every time there's a new product launch from AMD, the site admin (goes by the name CPUPro and GPUPro) changes his benchmark, then goes on a hateful rampage and spreads misinformation, and he pays good money to have his site put at the top of search engine suggestions when someone is looking for benchmark sites, which is then bolstered by people using the site either for the garbage benchmark tool or lack of knowledge about the site's true intentions.
Pretty much every other benchmark shows that the 6750-XT is right around the same as the 2080 Ti.
https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2080-Ti-vs-Radeon-RX-6750-XT
https://www.gpucheck.com/compare/amd-radeon-rx-6700-xt-vs-nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-ti/intel-core-i9-10900k-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz/
The reviews at launch placed it around the 3070, but it's faster now because AMD's performance improves after launch as drivers are updated.
https://www.techspot.com/review/2462-amd-radeon-6750xt/
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx-6750-xt-review/4
Good luck on PC forums believing and peddling that crap, you'll get eaten alive for spreading misinformation like that. And the survey isn't entirely accurate since it can easily be ignored and doesn't always ask.
And: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2080-Ti-vs-Radeon-RX-6750-XT
On that technical specs category page, it also clearly shows the RX is overclocked a lot..
Lets continue:
The RX 6750 XT is nothing but an overclocked and unstable burning pallet. Just like any other AMD/Ati hardware crap..
It has metrics that are merely snake oil, they only exist to be skewed against AMD. UBM is the only site to use said metrics like "effective speed." UBM doesn't make use of Passmark or other GPU benchmarks either, because it would reveal more lies.