安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You simply had a defective drive, it happens. Any drive can die at any time.
Yeah, seems like it. A search for "Samsung SSD failure" suggests there were a rash of Samsung drives crapping out before a few years use, particularly 900 series drives.
Its likely your issue is heat. Its why good airflow, heat sinks on SSDs and location are important.
I had my main OS SSD die on me after playing New World at launch, which had some controversy for overheating GPUs. The SSD was too close to the GPU and the heat just killed it.
The only thing I can recommend is make sure you keep your SSDs cool, use heat sinks for them if you can.
My motherboard came with these heat spreaders for the SSDs with attached thermal pads. My new SSD has it's own heatsink already attached, so I've left off the heat spreader. It's all in a new Fractal North case with 2x 140mm Noctua fans blowing in from the front, and one 120mm Noctua fan blowing out through the top rear.
3 case fans... that's it???
It's plenty, really. I'm not overclocking or anything, and the Fractal North is like, 60% mesh.
I mean, you can't really say: ssd/s last 10 years b/c not everyone's uses are the same and not all ssd/s are created equal.
In general: ssd/s tend to last longer than hdd/s. But that's about it to say with confidence.
NVM-e is rated to 70 degrees--above that for any extended time is gonna shorten its lifespan as you've prob. already noticed. If it had some defect out of the box, it's not difficult to understand why it dies "early."
Regarding the lifetime, I meant to say they that they "tend to", there are exceptions of course depending on the running conditions and quality of the drive among other factors. Yet 10-15 years is realistic for an SSD, while for a HDD that would be 5-10 years under normal usage.
While the NAND in SSDs have a finite write durability, they lack all of the mechanical failures points that HDDs have.
I don't think there's a strict study that has ever compared them. The closest we've gotten is some of the data put out by data centers, which isn't really the same thing, and I believe Backblaze has even commented that the data shouldn't necessarily be strictly taken at some of the face values people attribute to them (but IF you were going to, it paints a picture that SSDs would be just slightly less failure prone).
Yours didn't die of NAND wear out either, so it just failed. Sometimes it happens.
You should have backups for ALL data you care about, regardless of what media it is on. If it exists once, it is not backed up. Data that exists once, doesn't exist. Data that exists twice, exists once. Data that exist three times... etc.
A common fallacy people have is to "back up" things on an external drive, and it still only exists once. Ergo, it's not backed up.
They've been around for a good decade and a half in the consumer space. If they had seriously reduced average lifespans compared to HDDs, it'd be rather apparent by now. So whether it's a little more or a little less than HDDs, either way, they're not markedly unreliable comparatively.
I've tested several hdd's from brands like western digital etc. and all of them had a lifespan between 3-5 years, while my cheap cache-less ssd's from 2013, still hold on.
but here is here is the caveat and why you should take what I claim with a massive grain of salt. I usually don't copy huge files. my drive from 2013 has only 2TB written on it and the new ones... well let's say they are going to be safe for long time to come.
btw I suggest you don't add the motherboard heatsink on top of the ssd's. in my experience - from exchanging mine with a bigger drive - I saw that the thermal pads were dissolving.
Really, it depends on your use of them. That Micron drive was next to a Ryzen running at 105C 24/7 in a laptop, so it's not surprising it died.
Same here, I've got an 128GB SanDisk SATA SSD in my office PC that's been in there since 2010. SSD lifespans are based on writes not age.