Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
My MB is the ROG Crosshair VI Hero (my full specs are listed in my profile/bio). I think it's because of locks set up by AMD.
If anything, undervolting can get a performance boost. If you have Kombostrike (which I think is MSI specific), it got me to 4.45 after being limited to 4.2.
lower core voltage = less stable and lower temp
if its unstable, lower the oc or raise core voltage
Auto has it limited to 1.25V.
I would happily limit it to 1.20V though if it still runs stable and maybe even works faster - is that something worth trying?
(My CPU is running quite warm in idle, around 50°C)
What it may allow, however, is for the multi-core boost to be higher (since this is usually lower than the maximum due to both thermal and/or voltage reasons).
For example, on the 5800X3D, the maximum boost is stated as 4.5 GHz. I often see 4.45 GHz with brief moments of 4.55 GHz for maximums, but these are usually the result of measurement differences. This normalizes to about 4.5 GHz. Different software simply has different measurement precision.
But that's when one or a couple cores are under load. When all are under heavy load, I often see ~4.3 GHz plus or minus.
Likewise, the 5700X3D is listed as a 4.1 GHz maximum boost instead of 4.5 GHz, so if you're seeing 4.05 GHz a lot, that matches up exactly with what I'd expect. It might even drop to ~3.9 GHz under high core loads. Undervolting it will possibly bring lower temperatures and higher multi-core boosting (this is why some benchmark scores increase), but the absolute maximum won't go up.
The 5700X3D simply misses out on just under 10% of the clock speed (~.8.8% to be closer), and likewise, that's just about how much slower than the 5800X3D it tends to be. It's not like the 3700X compared to 3800X, or 5700X compared to 5800X, where it was "almost the same thing at a much lower price". In this case, the x700 model is missing a fair bit of clock speed (to the point the 5600X3D often outperforms it due to being clocked higher). It's often still a better value, but the results you're seeing are expected.
I'm not sure if the 5700X3D is binned as well but the 5800X3D almost always does -30 rather reliably.
it has separate vrm for the imc (memory controller), igpu and cpu cores