安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
However, even that can't be done for $200 - needs $350 minimum for an A8 APU (I wouldn't go lower than that because then you end up with a dual core CPU)
As long as u do remember the chain is as strong as its weakest link. Balance all and u be fine.
What out there is dual core now? Nothing except maybe i3 or FX-4xxx
Even though FX-4xxx is quad, it is not equal to most quads.
And no point in buying some old junk, like Core2Duo or Athlon II, etc.
Anyway, look the problem here is that any of the upper two (i3 or FX-4) do not have a GPU that can run Source games (which is sad). At least with a decent AMD APU, it will have a more than capable GPU for what he wants to do, yet u will spend about the same for an APU as you will for i3.
U really want to build, let me know I'll help u out.
http://ark.intel.com/products/76292/Intel-Core-i5-4400E-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-3_30-GHz
The best AMD APU is still far inferior to any discrete GPU, and OP said he's going to save $600 for a rig.
I'm not sure why you posted links to Intel CPUs... please explain?
If the OP is going to save up for a $600 rig, then he absolutely should not get an APU - I'm merely trying to confirm that it can't be done for $200 and that a dual core is an unwise CPU choice in this day and age.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Powerful-Gaming-Dell-OptiPlex-Desktop-Core-2-Duo-2-8-GHZ-4GB-Ram-1-TB-Drive-/321270892180?pt=Desktop_PCs&hash=item4acd3cc694
I don't think you need that since you probably have a monitor, keyboard and mouse, but it's an example.
Edit "from a USB not from a DVD" lol
My build to test this used:
CPU + GPU: AMD A6 5400K 2 core APU
RAM: 4GB (2*2GB) DDR3-1600
Motherboard: Cheap A55 socket FM2
HDD: cheapest 250GB HDD (could have potentially also used a even cheaper 16GB USB thumb drive if the motherboard would support booting off of it however the system would have had little use beyond TF2 then)
Case + PSU: Cheapest case & PSU combo that had at least 200w on the 12V rail.
I'm going further, even a 1500$ rig from 2010 can't run a 2013 GPU intensive game anywhere near 60fps, even at lowest, because there is a gap in the technology used for GPU processing, why do you think console makers needed to upgrade their platform to the "next-gen" level ?
to the op :
Still it's possible to make a potable gaming rig that can run almost all games with mid range setting for 500-600$, if you build it yourself and forget about the screen, dvd reader, and KB/M
If you're going this way, take your time, looking at all latest cards released by AMD and Nvidia, latest chips released by AMD and Intel, to compare with lower-end and cheaper parts, search for reviews and tests over Google, they'll most likely orient your choice !
But make sure your case, your power supply and your motherboard allow you to upgrade your computer (should be the most expensive parts imo, all the rest can be replaced over time and the old stuff sold as second hand to compensate)