Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I have an external USB 3.0 3 TB HDD I use to record game footage to. Works fine, no bottleneck.
http://web.forret.com/tools/video_fps.asp
I don't think I'd use an SSD for recording video to. An SSD's life expectancy is based on the number of write cycles and you really don't want to fill up any drive.
You can do some basic calculations for file size by looking at the amount of info contained in each frame. For example, the following assumes 1920x1080 res, 8-bit color, 30fps for 30 minutes.
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels per frame.
8 bits per pixel color x 2,073,600 pixels per frame = 16,588,800 bits per frame.
30fps x 16,588,800 bits per frame = 497,664,000 bits per second
1800seconds x 497,664,000 bits per second = 895,795,200,000 bits per 30 minutes
89,579,520,000 bits per 30 minutes / 8 (bits/byte) = 111,974,400,000 bytes per 30 minutes
There are 1024Bytes/KB, 1024KB/MB, and 1024MB/GB. So, the above would come to ~104GB with no compression or additional file overhead.
There is no point in having a scratch drive if you are just going to use a hard drive. By using an SSD youd be able to edit and process video more smoothly. SSD do have a limited amount of writes but really it would take years to cause any problems even with moderate to high use. If you have the extra $60-100 and plan on recording and editing a decent amount the ssd would be a worth while investment in my opinon. If you just want to record games casually for fun then going right to the hard drive shouldnt be an issue
life expectancy with an SSD is really not an issue anymore with these new gen SSD's , true back a few years ago the LE was a little low , but right now a good SSD will outlast a mechanical drive with normal use even with video recording it shouldn't be a problem.
Now if you are just recording video i agree, no need for an SSD , however if you do alot of editing to the video , then you will benefit of an SSD's high data transfer rate.
Usually the reasons people experience large drops is because they often are trying to run OS, Game, and Video Capture all of a single HDD, and that is where the bottlenecking comes into play and the drive chugs on the recording and while the recording may come out ok, the end result is large FPS drops in-game during the making of that video capture.
Best case is this:
SSD for OS
Performance HDD for your Game Installs
Performance HDD for your video recordings (basically anything that is not a 5400rpm "Green" drive)
By performance I mean something that is:
> 7200rpm and 32mb or 64mb buffer
> SATA-II, III or USB 3.0
For internal HDDs, models such as these should be more than enough performance to house your games or for video capture.
> WD Blue or Black
> Seagate Barracuda
Then when it comes to cheaper drives where you just need storage for backing up files, then that is perhaps a time to use a Green model drive, where the speed of the drive is not nearly as important.