Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Este tema ha sido cerrado 
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
Corsair Vengeance 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1866 MHZ (PC3 15000) Desktop Memory (CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9)
$107.59
http://www.amazon.com/Corsair-Vengeance-Desktop-Memory-CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9/dp/B004CRSM52/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1387060351&sr=8-1&keywords=CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9
they are a complete waste of money
for that you can get an i7 4820k /w 2011 build which will eat it alive
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-I7-4820k-vs-AMD-FX-9590
what country are you in?
whats your budget?
I kinda want to be able to upgrade to 32gb in the future, would it actually be better to have 2x 4gb, of did you just suggest that because it's cheaper?
3.7 gHz quadcore instead of 4.7 gHz octacore.
gg
HELL ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ NO.
The intel chips blow the AMD socket out of the water when it.
2011 has Quad-channel ram etc etc. Trust us,you want 2011 socket. Not the insane TDP AMD gimmick chips. Also it's not a octa core. It's a quadcore with hyperthreading rather. 2 cores share the same resource pool. Don't be foolish and think you can get a true octacore for 300 bucks haha. Get a 4930K if you can and you will be flying. Also , more than gaming only uses 4 cores. a i7 4770K will serve you perfectly fine with a MUCH MUCH lower TDP and heat production.
Get a FX 8350 if you want, but not a 9590, the 9590 is a gimmick overclockers cpu.
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-4770K-vs-AMD-FX-9590
The i7 4770K wins of the FX 9590, and thats not even enthusiast socket.
Read this: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/id-1820580/video-editing-rig-amd-9590-ghz-850-overclocked-intel-core-4770k-350.html
Like somebody said, NOBODY, NOBODY WOULD EVER RECOMMEND A FX 9590.
If you are not willing to take advice from people who know their ♥♥♥♥, why post here in the first place?
Fist of all, I never said I wanted to do video editing.
Second, you don't seem to have read the posts you linked:
"I would not recommend the 9590, unless you have the cooler and motherboard to go with."
(and this was posted when the 9590 cost 850$...)
I am getting the cooler and the motherboard with it, or at least that's what I'm trying to do, which brings me to my last point.
I'm not here for you to recommend me a different build. I'm here to make sure the hardware I chose works well together...
If you're not willing to read the thread, why post here in the first place?
As for the the link .I mean the comments. I wanted you to look at the comments and see what people say there, almost everybody would advise agianst a FX 9590.
For gaming the FX9590 will provide you no benefit over a i7 but a load of heat. The i7 will performance 100% equal in games with 100 watts less. I am not sure why you want to get that CPU. If you insist on sticking with the '8 core' way then get the FX 8350 which is the same CPU but with a much lower TDP. The FX 9590 is a super OC gmmick chip. It has no real purpose. It doesn't beat intels higher segment. And it doesn't provide any benefit in gaming over the FX 8350.
I think it's good to make you aware that getting the FX 8350 or the i7 is a better option for your build. however if you are really set in stone about that FX 9590 (Reconsider it ,really;) then :
yes, that should all fit very well. You don't need a 1000 watt psu. a 850 watt should do you fine, but getting a 1050 watt will obviously not hurt anything (except your wallet maybe ;) )
EDIT: On the Asus Website it states that the Sabertooth 990FX supports cpu's with a TDP of up to 150 watts. the FX 9590 has 220 watt. So the Sabertooth won't take that chip (or it would severely damage the motherboard / bluescreen due to lack of power)
Links:
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/SABERTOOTH_990FX_R20/#specifications
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/62166-amd-fx-9590-review-piledriver-5ghz-17.html
I'd suggest FX-8350, as you can bump it upwards of 5 Ghz range (or even higher) fairly easily.
For SSD I would highly suggest Samsung 840 EVO series.
For PSU I'd go with a Gold or Platinum series model from brands such as Corsair, EVGA, Seasonic, Silverstone.
Yeah, sorry, I may have overreacted a bit.
The "Related resources" window led me to believe that there were no more comments posted on that thread, again, my bad.
the amd am3+ cpus have 8 cores, but their l2 cache is ganged into 4x 2mb pools
each core doesnt have its own l2
haswell 1150 cpus have 256k of l2 cache per core, and its much faster
if its for video editing/encoding or rendering, go for a 2011 build
for gaming 1150
the amd 9000s are just the top binned 8000 cpus with a higher clock
just amds last ditch at saving the am3+ socket
but at 200w vs 84w with an i5 will have the same overall performace
http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/amd-fx9590-5ghz-review-w-gigabyte-990fxa-ud5/26/
As for optimisation for 8cores. the 8350 /9590 is not a true 8 core. The way the chip is build out of modules makes it very similar to a i7. 4 cores, 8 threads.
So if games ever benefit from 8 core then it will be just as good on the i7 as it would be on the 8350. Even the 4670K i5 will perfrom just as good. It's the most common gaming cpu for a reason. It's the best bang4buck. its only 90 watts or so. The 8350 is more of a budget option, since the Intel cpu's are faster but just much more expensive. Considering you have 300 bucks to spend on a CPU, just grab the 4770K or so. It will do you better. the AMD 8 cores are good in multitasking. In normal desktop usage single core performance is much more important, and the i7 has much faster single core performance or 'per core' performance if you will.
I build loads of PC's and all builds of a 1000+ euro I have done are Intel.
A i5 will do you just as good of a job. But getting a i7 won't hurt. Something with a nice MSI G65 or so will OC pretty good. Core and Clockspeed are not the only deciding factor in CPU performance unlike common believe. It's quite complicated.
And if you want to stick with the AMD 8core. Get the 8350. It'sc SOOO much easier man. The 9590 = 8350 with 100 more watts and a 5ghz clockspeed. Just overclock your own 8350 to 5ghz. The 9590 is a gimmick chip and as a hardware enthusiast I even wonder why on earth they even released the thing. It serves no purpose.
I was unable to find a list of motherboard able to take the 9590. My guess is that you need a really expensive overclocking board. Like I said before, and countless others said, please do yourself a favor and get the 8350 or a i7. Both excellent choices. :)
Why should there be? Have you looked on the asus site? If it isn't there it isn't around.
Cooler: Which one's better, the price is nearly identical...
More people asked this question ,conclusion ,they are also practically identical in terms of performance, so just get what you like the look of the most.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1419068/corsair-h100i-vs-thermaltake-water-3-0-extreme
RAM: Can the Sabertooth handle DDR3-2133?
It supports 1833 offical, but it will do 2133 Yes. However the performance difference between 1833 and 2133 in actual use is very minimal, You won't notice the difference. I'ts overkill for gaming. I'd go with 1833 if I were you.
Case: the two cases I listed are just random cheap cases, I may get a different one. Is there anything I should consider when buying a case?
You should consider:
Cable management?
Airflow?
Does everything fit? (GPU Length)
Horizontal HDD Bays? (So cables go off the the side instead of the motherboard)
Take a look at the Corsair 650D or other Obsidian series. I personally love those cases.
I myself have a Coolermaster 690 II.
Also point to note is, if you want a window or not?
PSU: Again, which one's better (for my build)?
I personally never diviate from: BeQuite, Seasonic and Corsair when it comes to powersupplies. A powersupply is a very important part of your PC. I know those 3 brands make excellent powersupplies and therefor I trust them with powering my PC ;D
That in mind , I would get the Corsair. However, try if you can get a AX or AX850i . A gold labeled powersupply is recommended. The HX850 does it's job excellent though. I have one myself.
The R9 290X (and even all other R9 series) are long cards and will not fit some smaller cases.
Make sure you have more than enough room for the GPU. If the case does not say how much room it has to fit a GPU on the manufacturer page then chances are it is not a lot and it will not fit. Usually when it's a small case they do not say and when it's a big one made to fit big GPUs they tell you how many mm or inches (or both) GPU length is supported.
Also for such a nice build I would want 16GB of RAM if you can swing it, not cause you will need it now. You don't. Just to save having to upgrade in the future and to be able to upgrade to a full 32GB if ever needed.
As for speed, yes the board can support 2133 (overclocked) BUT the CPU can not without overclocking. Maximum supported by CPU is 1866. It can do higher but that overclocks the IMC or something.
About the GPU also. In USA / Canada it is a bad time to buy high end AMD card. I'd almost suggest to buy a cheap $100~ HD 7790 and then wait for the R9 290X to come out with dual fan custom coolers and drop down to $300~ in price. You'd probably end up with a HD 7790 + better cooled R9 290X for the same or less price if prices drop the same way they did last generation. $550+ is just too much money to pay for a graphics card. Bad value.
The HD 7790 does more GFLOPS per dollar. Not sure about in Austria though.
As for the motherboard you are thinking of the "Rev 2 / Gen 3" it's still a revision two but they tacked on Gen 3 and that means it has PCIe 3 supported by combining 32 PCIe 2 lanes from the CPU to make 16 PCIe 3 lanes on the motherboard. If you can find one this might be a better choice for such a high end graphics card. However in the USA they appear to all be out of stock, sold out or discontinued. Limited supply.
Average? this is excellent gaming PC. It will serve him very well.
the Fx 8350 performs on-par with the highest end i5 in gaming, the 3570K - 4670K.
It's excellent value for money.
Yes the Stock R290X are loud and hot. Better wait for the reference designs.
PCI 3.0 is not needed for any card and only provides benefit for SLI/Crossfire. As for 'lack of AMD procoessros' what does that even mean? What do CPU's have to do with PCI 3.0...
FX 8350 doesn't bottleneck a videocard, i5 4670K doesn't. So,please tell me how any other test results should be relevant? Frames on games with both cpus are extremely similar. Thats the test results i've seen.
I personally would have gone with a i5 too in this build. But it's not my build :)
touche, No I don't know that indepth stuff, how can a controller emulate bandwith that doesn't exist?. But what 'lack' of AMD CPU's?
I try to focus on what it does for me as a consumer.
And you don't need PCI 3.0 with any of the single cards out today.