Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
So you can just wait at least a day before making a decision.
i'll wait a day but it'll probably come back to these two gpu's again.
The pcie lane difference has zero impact, you need a far faster gpu to saturated 8 pcie4 lanes.
and even more so with the 4060 than the 3060
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMOxX1IvfIw
with the 3060 you maybe loose 1-5%
with the 4060 you loose 5-15%
even with the loss the 4060 is the faster card but it's closer then it usually would be between the two.
That is pcie3 vs pcie4, 0cie4 has double the bandwidth of pcie3, so 8x pcie4 is the same as 16x pcie3.
As I said, it will be fine.
i mentioned my system in the original post.
the 4060 is pcie 8x which is fine for 4.0 boards but since it halves pcie 3.0 bandwidth making it more or less 2.0 speeds.
Edit.
Sorry I miss read it, you will still be fine, you won't be anywhere close to saturating a pcie3 x16 slot on a 3060.
you don't seem to understand that the 4060 is a 8X card and why that matters for 3.0 pcie.
when it runs on pcie 4.0 it will only use 8 of those lanes. since the card doesn't fully saturate the bandwidth it is fine. it however will also only use 8 of the lanes on pcie 3.0
the bandwidth on both is cut in half. meaning on 4.0 it can use upto 15.754 GB/s
but on 3.0 it can only use up to 7.877 GB/s instead of the full amount of pcie 3.0
which is 15.754 GB/s
the 3060 is a pcie 16x card meaning it can use upto the full bandwidth of ether 4.0 or 3.0 (not that it actually does)
the reason there's a performance loss is that the 4060 and 3060 will use more then 7.877 GB/s but since the 3060 isn't limited by 8 lanes on pcie it doesn't matter nearly as much as it does for the 4060.
with the 3060 you loose 1-5%
with the 4060 you loose 5-15%
depending on the game.
again 4060 will still be faster but not as much with less vram. it's why i even made this post in the first place. is it worth the get more vram but a slightly less powerful gpu on my current setup or get less vram and a slightly faster card on my setup.
Like the RTX4060 is faster than the 3060 by 10-15% in raw performance, but then gets rekt because the PCIe lanes are slowing the card. VRAM is situational, but good to have like in your case.
Yeah, you won't have DLSS FG and it will consume more electricity but the upscaler is the same. I would take more frames based on the game engine simulation instead of other frames.
Here, from puget testing a 4080
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Frtx-4060-in-a-pcie-3-0-x-8-slot-instead-of-a-pcie-4-0-x-8-v0-sjch6ac6yomd1.png%3Fwidth%3D720%26format%3Dpng%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3Dc6f856cb5b9f873503a0f529c7ecdbc0f7a9982b
So, even in my sleep deprived confusion, as I said, you'd be fine.