Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
http://techreport.com/review/27067/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-and-970-graphics-cards-reviewed/11
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_970_sli_review,16.html
If you play at 1080p (which you should, it's the native res) then a 970sli will do you good with those games, i.e BF4 with single 970 ~75fps and with sli ~130fps with an i7 @4.2ghz:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_970_SLI/6.html
A 970sli setup can be bottlenecked by cpu so if you do get an i5, you will need to OC it. Probably same with i7. Get a K version and OC with a decent cpu cooler.
Hyperthreading does cause issues in some games, but is useful for some applications. It can always be turned off for some games if needed, don't worry about it too much.
I don' think you will be happy with one 970. 1440 is out of the question imo. I'm sure it may be able to hit 120hz+ but not constant and not on med/high settings. With a high hz monitor, you want it to stay at the target hz as much as possible. I would plan on running something in sli. I would get one 980 and get another later if you can't get two now. You want to be future proof for a little while.
Yeah it will make a difference, its really not worth the price. Stock i5 4690k vs overclocked 4790k @ 4.8 you might be talking 5-10 fps.. the extra threads won't even be used. Gpu is 90% of the equation imo. You'll get MUCH greater return spending that money on another gpu.
Hyper threading issues? Whut? I've never once even heard of this... What issues?
But I'm suprised about the frame rate, so a single GTX970 is not able to give me 100-120fps. Do I need the good monitor then? If the single 970 runs lets say at 70-80fps, is a normal monitor with no refresh rate of 144Hz able to give me the 70-80 fps or do I still need the 144Hz monitor??
The point about getting 2 graphic cards is problematic, I am a student and my money is pretty limited, I can afford decent gaming PC but not the real expensive ♥♥♥♥.
So I am still statisfied with 80fps average with High quality graphics. Do I need a 144Hz monitor for that??
and the CPU: So i doesn't really matter about the i5 vs. i7? I guess I just look for good offers and decide then...
That being said, I am using a 60hz monitor, so it's fine for me, but if you're looking at a 120hz model, then I can only imagine that going from 60-120FPS may be as problematic as 30-60.
But a single 970 just won't cut it for those new games unless you start reducing settings. Which is a shame with a 970.
A good i5 K version like i5-4690K won't bottleneck you probably even in SLI, just don't go for the slower ones, and OC later if needed with an aftermarket CPU cooler.
TL DR; 144hz is really expensive for new games (apart from CS GO maybe), maybe not worth it.
You could get by with a 970 and gsync for a little while.
go for it buddy ;) Im reading all about PC hardware for 2 month and still I dont know ♥♥♥♥, so better you inform yourself a little bit as well because I could be wrong :P
I'll cut the i7 which you all say is not necessary and take the almost 80€ cheaper i5 4690K, so I save a little bit money here :)
When it comes to my main question about fps and graphics:
Even its true what youre saying here Im a little bit disappointed. I already upgraded from the GTX 760 4GB to the 970 because people told me the 970 is way better (and plus 100€)... It is allready quite expensive for a student though but I thought the 970 is for gaming beastly.
But I see I can still get problems with fps etc. while playing on high settings, not even mentioning Ultra... I just didnt know that, I have still to learn sooo much ^^
Lets put it this way: For games like Far Cry 4, BL2 or Shadow of Mordor I am statisfied with a minimum of fluently 60fps on High settings, I should be good here with a single gtx 970?? And for this the normal 60Hz monitor should work just fine...
For Counter-Strike GO I actually need more fps, but this game doesnt need that much for graphics so I think it is possible as well?? If this is the case I could upgrade to the 120Hz-144Hz monitor.
When it comes to G-Sync I have absolutely NO WAY to pay for it, it is over 400€ this is way to much for me, my budget limit for a monitor is 250€.
So Im still not sure if its worth it or not... How big are the tearing effects on 60Hz monitors while handling more fps, lets say 80? Sorry for all this questions guys but I am trying to get an expert in 2 month and this is quite hard :D :D