Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
speed / cl = value (hgher = better)
2666 / 15 = 177
2800 / 16 = 175
not much difference between them
Just to give you some idea...
Optimal performance would of been:
1600MHz CL9 1.5V (Calculated performance: 178)
Peak performance would be:
1600MHz CL7 1.5V (Calculated performance: 229)
or
1866MHz CL9 1.5V (Calculated performance: 207)
Where as overclocked MHz would actually be slightly slower, the higher voltage is also damaging in some cases:
2666MHz CL13 1.65V (Calculated performance: 205)
As you see lower CL timing normally calculates to better overall performance. You can calculate it as already mentioned above ( MHz / CL = Value ), to get a better idea of what one is best. For gaming purposes I would suggest getting the lowest CL timing possible.
DDR4 is however lower voltage and double the bandwidth, I don't honestly know if that calculation would matter as much or even apply. If it does, I would personally multiple it by two, due to the major increase in bandwidth (For example: 177 performance would be 354 for DDR4, compared to DDR3).
To go even deeper... CAS Latency (CL Timing) is actually broken down:
15-17-17-35
vs
16-18-18-36
It's a good idea to check all those values (as some memory cheats, claiming to be low CL timing, but it's just the first value and the rest is high). Since the values are raised by just 1 each and voltage stays the same 1.2V, the 2800MHz could actually be the better performing. How much real-world difference, probably not much. The other 2666MHz appears to be much more popular, most likely because it's a better deal.
Why do you say that? If the timings are twice as high, you're not seeing the big picture for performance. What are you buying for a CPU?
It's gonna be an x99 system. And there are only 3 cpu's available for it so it would not be hard to guess.
It's gonna be Asus rampage v extreme with an i7-5930k.
And as far as i seen, c14 is the lowest as ddr4 go, and they cost up to 1500gbp for 64gb set too... So they are probably good.