Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
You may have a slight bottleneck in some games but on the other hand, what are your options?
Going for an older card is definately not advisable. And if you are aiming for the i3/750 combo eventually it makes sense to start with the GPU. *shrug*
I guess my question is what are ideal scenarios for low-end intel and nvidia cards. is a pentium sufficient for a 750? do i really need the i3 in the long run? could i pair the celeron with a 750 with no bottleneck? maybe a pentium with a 750 ti?
Pentium G3258 would be a good minimum for gaming that don't have a real need for power of i5 or i7.
Celeron is just below the belt so to speak and won't cut it really.
I'd upgrade the CPU if the board can accept others, that way your GPU won't be so limited and/or bottlenecked by the CPU. For under $200 range for a GPU, I'd shoot for R9 270, nearly same price-point as a GTX 750 Ti, while being just a tad under the performance of a GTX 760.
those would cost something like ~$260 (canadian) which i think would work in the near future
http://ca.pcpartpicker.com/search/?cc=ca&q=gtx+750+ti+2gb