Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Keep in mind you can ONLY install 64-bit guests on a 64-bit host IF and ONLY IF your BIOS and Processor supports VT (virtualisation) extensions (most modern ones do however lower models in the range may not).
Not this is RTW (Release to Web) and not previews.
Run it in VirtualBox (Free too), and see. I test all new platform migrations this way, testing what I need to disable/enable/remove/add. I don't jump blindly into platform updates. But for those essential apps that Wine does not work well with (Adobe or .Net stuff generally), then this is great. No activation hassles when reconfiguring VM's as before..
Well the personalisation SHOULD be non-functioning but it is (most of the time). So, grab it while you can anyway, you never know :)
Sure they were going to push out forced W10 upgrades to all (few months ago they did and claimed it was an accident) then they said they would do it again today, but the backlash came out over the web again and they backed off it seems (they won't stop trying you can be sure of that).
They REALLY want you on W10 because their future strategy is based on it and the online store and it being a client in their Azure / Store world.
That is why it is free for consumers. It is a "vehicle" platform to their services.
Their tools are free too for the community editions (Sql Server/Visual Studio) etc (as long as you don't want the big enterprise features you're fine.
And they are targeting other platforms (Android and soon OSX and Linux for their "Services").
They even have an APT clone ready (OneGet and Chocolatey).
After all, a VM uses the same machine.
If so, there's your answer - though many may not know why it is being done.
[I'm not referring to the kind of VM like the Win7 XP Mode, which emulated a fixed set of low end hardware so it wouldn't be like giving away a free XP x86 licence]
It is a "machine" whatever way you specify it. it is up to you how you specify the machine.
I can get a spare HD and install it on that, I will do that tomorrow to check. I am sure it is fine.
My virtual machines are all 8 GiB, 4 CPU, 50 GIB storage, that is not small spec :)
They are a machine, with a SID identifier and everything, right down to your Network MAC address, USB devices, CPU models.
I should clarify:-
Would a VM leak the hardware profile and location of the ORIGINATING machine that it is running on?
Not necessarily the container OS, which is of no real consequence regarding the reasoning I'm referring to.
You mean breaking out of the virtual machine, that is quite very very difficult (but not impossible and those bugs are patched quickly on VM apps). As far as Windows is concerned (and indeed Linux), it is it's own computer.
But I will install it on real hardware tomorrow with a spare HDD and get back on here with the results.
The hardware is the same yes (unless you specify more HDD controllers, or less, or no USB or other attributes of the machine) , but some is "virtualised" the CPU is obviouly the same, however, the attributes are what you specify (cores etc). Location is obviously the same, since you use the same router and internet but you CAN change that if you connect to a different network endpoint for your wifi/ethernet, or you can use a Wifi mobile hotspot on your android phone and it will obviously be whatever it's connected to. If you want a very differnet location, use a VPN. It can be quite different if you really want it to.
Meanwhile, location obfuscation requires knowledge and intervention, which not many general users do.
I've seen reports that the Win10 VM is not to be trusted, but we're not talking about a VM within a VM.
If Win10, running from within a VM of a host OS, can data-gather and profile that host machine, its owner and that owner's location (assumed via ownership) it may well be free as you say, though not well advertised, as that would cause suspicion.
Up to you :) I actually like Continuum very much, yes Cortana and the metrics and updates I agree (that is why you buy Enterprise to be in control of it using a policy from the domain controllers ), for consumers, well, that is your future unless you go Linux (and even then Canonical et all will do the same in time).
Either way, W10 is free and I'm glad so I don't have to waste my W7 licenses in VM's for a few apps (Illustrator, Lightroom and Visual Studio and maybe Office) when I go mobile with Linux Mint :)
If Linux had a Coninuum type interface (not Unity, bleh), then I would use that instead of Cinnamon (but I still need a way to run those essential apps I need on Linux).
So for people on Linux/OS X that need Windows for small usage, free is good.
I will get back about installing it on real hardware tomorrow after I play about with HDDs on my Linux laptop :) I will simply replace the HDD's and install for a while. I don't want to USB disk install it because it's via the CPU and it's slower as USB is CPU bound.
Be sure to click "I don't have a product key" when installing.
I'm not referring to me.
I'm not considering this.
I'm trying to send a warning.
I have Win10 off the back of my Win7 purchase and I don't care about that.
Sure, I could have scored an extra copy this way - giving me both - but I don't need Win7 or 10 licences for VMs.
The stuff I would run in a VM is XP Pro x86 within Linux, Unix or XP Pro x64, and Linux within Linux.
NOTHING[!!!] under the OSMTH ["Umbrella Corp"] military, their entire Livery system, its Worshipful Company of Information Technologists, their CERN and travelling their web/net "pipes" is private.
You simply must decide what level to give them the run-around, which is easier the less you make a scene - like me, but I ain't afraid to speak out.
My Win10 machine holds my commercial person[a], but this person is only associated with employment, a few emails, a couple of online sales outlets, an online payment method, Steam and GOG, and is isolated from the real me, my other machines and OS environments, including my key-ring via the fact that I don't use those facilities on them to avoid cross-profiling.
I don't mind them getting my hardware for this machine.
They're not getting anything else from this machine though, and not tying any other devices to me.
Their G**gl* is completely banned from all my machines and, as such, the intended dependency upon this SRI creation is begginnig to show with my web functionality breaking down as I refuse to let the monster have my info.
Your idea of encrypting in the cloud is ridiculous.
Merely by using any cloud, you gave whatever you uploaded.
Yeah - and, as for "Canonical", there's a clue right there in the word, right smack in your face.
Anyway, I have a basic user question:-
How do I get Win10 to stop ignoring my file associations, so it doesn't keep asking me how to open files?
My associations are obeyed when one program calls another to complete a task, though ignored when attempted to directly open from within Explorer.
It's begun to pull this crap again and I can't remember how I fixed it in my last Win10 install attempt - because I remember it did the same, but haven't managed to find the solution on the web this time around.
Where is this new, globally-overarching, setting ticked somewhere?
I'm still not used to system tools and settings being divided between combined interfaces of Metro and traditional Explorer.
My copies of XP x86 and x64 do as they're told once file associations are set, as does Win7 x64.