Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
You don't seem to understand how you've contradicted yourself. I'll quote you again:
Here, you are saying "pure gamers (who can afford it)" should get an SSD. "Everyone," does not exclude anyone. It includes "pure gamers" who can aford an SSD. But yet later you followed up with this statement:
Now you say, pure gamers (people who only care about FPS and image quality) shouldn't get an SSD.
Not a contradiction?
Any purchased product that does not serve the consumer's need is a waste of money.
So you used the word, "quick" because you don't want to appear as though you've complimented me by visiting my profile because of your interest in gathering information about me or is it because you don't want to appear as though you are snooping around? Which is it?
You're another person who doesn't understand the purpose of the thread. Read it. It's about proving justifictions.
If you have read the entire post you would have seen that I have answered my own question by giving my own opinion/stance. If I answered my own question then the thread is obvioulsy not about if an SSD is recommendable or not but how can a "pure gamer" justify spending the extra cash on a product that does need meet his needs.
"So you used the word, "quick" because you don't want to appear as though you've complimented me by visiting my profile because of your interest in gathering information about me or is it because you don't want to appear as though you are snooping around? Which is it?"
I visited your profile, don't get excited.
Who said I was? Still, you didn't answer my question.
"So you've used the word, "quick" because:
1. You didn't want to appear as though you've complimented me by visiting my profile because of your interest in gathering information about me.
or
2. Because you don't want to appear as though you are snooping around, being a busybody.
Which is it?"
Who said I was?
The SSD won't affect your FPS unless you run games that load things on the fly. It will improve load times for levels and I like that.
I'm not sure what this thread is actually providing for advice. Most gamers know if an SSD will help them and most gamers know that an SSD won't improve in-game performance unless the game needs to load things while on the move.
When I am on my PC, I spend 98% gaming, the other 2%, answering and writing emails. My PC is virtually a heavily improved gaming console of the 70s-80s.
I answered my own question, "Pure Gamers: Was the SSD Worth the Extra Cash Per GB?" by giving my on stance on SSD. The thread is about how does a "pure gamer" justify the extra money spent on an SSD if it doen't serve the "pure gamer's" need (improved FPS and image quality)?
Is common sense universal? People do have their own ways to justify the things that don't seem justifiable. The thread isn't only the attempt for the "pure gamer" to find ways to justify spending cash on a product that doen't serve his needs but it's also about opening up one's mind to other people's ways of thinking. It may be worth implementing. The only way to find the truth is to put it to the test.
I think having the OS on an SSD and the games on another disk is a tremendous boost. The whole computer runs faster. The spinning platter disc is free of unneeded tasks, and is much faster reading game files, that and storage space is cheaper yes. The meager amount of space typical SSD hasn't been worth the trouble of putting games/programs on it alone. That's why I suggest the dual drive setup in the first place SSD for OS and traditional Hybrid or standard HDD for everything else. I use the Hybrid for everything else drive due to the 8Gb flash cache on the drive for opening programs and games faster and file transfer rates are insane.
About SHDD - I think that is mostly marketing hype. I tested NAND/SSD caching and noticed no any performance boost at all. More than that, I got about 1% IOPL decrease.
Maybe SSD can be useful for the laptop (although I did not notice that), but I do not see any benefit from it in my desktop.