Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
1080p monitor, around 22-24in looks good
1080p 27+ pixels are bigger
tt, my monitor is a Acer S243HLAbmii (24", 1080p, 60hz, 2ms). Ergonomics inexistent, but it looks damn cool.
Although, I plan to upgrade to the Asus ROG Swift Pg278q in the future.
I thought it will be a bit big for gaming, but no true, is perfect. However some older games look rather blocky, even if I enable the 4:3 which doesn't streches them.
Seems the number using 16:9 is far higher as of 16:10. Thats good to know as long I'm
still designing wallpapers for multiple art communities.
Price-wise, it's finally coming down to somewhat affordable levels with e.g. Samsung 28" 4K60 monitor (UD590 or something).
However, to play newer games at 4K smoothly, you'd need some serious GPU power, pretty much top end GPUs in SLI/CFX and even then some games might struggle.
Imo it's a bit like with 1080p. The resolution is there and the screen tech has overcome the weird first quirks (like requiring multiple connectors for a full 4K image; achieving 60hz etc), but the hardware to game properly at the resolution is not quite affordable yet.