Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
When you pile every little thing up and use the latest packages, Linux can very easily outperform Windows in a lot of tasks, if you're using a distro that is built for long term support like Mint, there will be less of a gap as packages are out of date compared to the higher performance packages available with rolling release distributions like Arch.
i.e. Pop!_OS gaming performance trades blows with Windows 11 while Arch distros outperform it by a small margin.
Do keep in mind that it's not consistently the same difference across the board, as it can heavily vary even just by what version of Proton you're using, older versions garner less performance as they're less optimised but might have better results with old games, newer versions are updated to take advantage of newer driver features like DLSS and FSR. Furthermore, because Wine and Proton are compatibility layers, it's not the same as having native support, you'll lose some performance normally through this method, but it's been so optimised with later versions that the difference is usually imperceptible and in some cases actually favours Wine/Proton over native support in performance.
No. You're not "delulu". Via Proton, Linux seems to have better compatibility out the door with older Windows games than modern Windows does. Another example is the original Max Payne from 2001.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/12140/Max_Payne/
On Windows 10/11, it requires about three different third party fixes as well as a number of ini edits to get working correctly. On Linux, it just works with no fix needed, although you might want to use a widescreen fix anyway or you'll be limited to only 4:3 resolutions.
The problem with the Linux - Windows comparisons is that they are testing default Windows vs Linux distro that it is either preaty average or it is something like Cachy. Meanwhile Windows has a lot of stuff that can be touched.
The "modified" Windows isos are stupidly made.
Most my games run the same, some run better.
I'm on Mint.
For Radeon the difference between linux and windows is so small as to generally be unnoticeable.
Completely false. It's a huge boost.
A common misconception. Windows takes a fair bit of setup and tweaking to be usable.
No, it does not.
Only tweaking I ever do is in the 15 minutes ish it takes to do a fresh install after that, I don't touch it and not had issues really for decades at this point.
Getting rid of all the bloat programs with Powershell because Microsoft won't allow you to uninstall them, disabling Services setting up Group Policy adding Registry keys and removing others.
Whereas when I tried linux mint there was only a few programs that I didn't need and they were easy to uninstall. I also liked the Software Manager I found most of the apps I use in windows are in linux.
It's really quite impressive.
Protondb.com is your friend for Linux gaming.
lmao, what? No. That's a blatant lie.
I use Nvidia hardware and it runs either equal to or better than when I was using Windows.
I mean, No, you don't have to jump through hoops.
My installation and switch to Mint was easy and brainless. A literal moron could do it.