Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-9-9950x.html
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/memory/memory-limits-for-windows-releases
the limiting factor is the cpu at 192g
but the boards max is 64g per dimm
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/6wzp99/gskill-flare-x5-96-gb-2-x-48-gb-ddr5-6000-cl30-memory-f5-6000j3036f48gx2-fx5
Lol, dude CL30 is fine. Cl30 6000 is whats being used on AMD CPUS while destroying Intel running MUCH higher end dimms.
Keep in mind that while you will probably need to reduce RAM frequency to get it stable (at least if you go with a four DIMMs), it will still be stable. And since you're doing workloads that sound like they need the extra RAM, that sort of forces your hand because reduced RAM frequency is still better than "not enough RAM". If you had an X3D CPU, this reduction would be less of a concern (at least for most games).
I thought 64 GB consumer DIMMs have started appearing recently, but maybe it's still early for them.
Never been a problem.
I'd never need 128 and really dont have an idea about that but I
Imagine it would be much harder to get setup running stable.
As pointed out earlier 2X48 GB might be a better option at least if you want to keep it at higher speeds.
now find 64g dimms close to 6000 cl30
https://pcpartpicker.com/products/memory/#b=ddr5&Z=65536001,131072002
6000 at 128 never happens.
Now there are plenty of chances something might change. As of yet not recommended.
I understand. I do have EXPO enabled with my current kit, but I never realized that adding more RAM would increase POST time. That’s definitely something I’ll keep in mind moving forward.
Thanks for taking the time to gather and share those references. That’s consistent with what I’ve been seeing as well during my own research.
That seems to confirm where things stand at the moment: we’re not quite there yet for 128 GB without making some form of compromise, whether it's speed, voltage, or stability.
There were two main reasons I chose the 9950X. First, the X3D variant wasn’t available when I built the system, I assembled it in February, just before the X3D version was released. Second, I was already slightly over budget with the components I selected, and stepping up to X3D would’ve pushed it too far.
Down the road, I’d also like to upgrade my NVMe setup to three Samsung 4 TB drives. I’ve never been disappointed with Samsung’s SSD hardware, they’ve been rock solid in every build I’ve worked with.
At any rate, I’m more than happy to keep reading about your experiences with RAM. Like I mentioned earlier, I’m fully open to settling for 64 or 96 GB if it means keeping performance and stability intact.
Edit: didn't do a good read there...I see that you can, but yes, you do run into the problem of not many options, in terms of a 2 stick setup? I mean I would think it would be rather hard to even find a good 128gb 4 stick array