HDMI 2.2 vs DP 2.1b

[404NotFound]

HDMI 2.2 96Gbps vs DP 2.1b 80Gbps

Will need to wait for next gen cards in order to utilize HDMI 2.2

https://www.pcworld.com/article/2596159/hdmi-2-2-vs-displayport-2-1b-explained.html

[Midnight Aurais]

displayport why wel i am moving to linux the hdmi forum is being a prick about hdmi support on linux

hdmi in a nutshell is one of those invite only parties normies may not attend

display port is a party everybody can attend

problem is no mather how you see it hdmi is their product if they gatekeep it it kinda is their right just that it is not very nice to do so but i do not think they care if we find them nice or not

[_I_]

why are you comparing them?
at any given time, dp/dvi-d have been ahead of hdmi

dp > dvi-d > hdmi -> dvi-a = vga

[Tiberius]

Hdmi has better audio/arc support and cec. Tbh, i'd pick hdmi over dp these days. Dp bandwidth is overkill and 99% of the users prolly nvr use most of it.

Thunderbolt is even better, but it's stupidly more expensive than dp or hdmi

[_I_]

dp can support audio, if the monitor has speakers

or you can use hdmi audio to a receiver without video

[Çapgun]

Still using vga monitors so if you want to compare hdmi widened especially for console compatibility while dp far more super for pc

[C1REX]

I personally don’t see much difference. I use gaming TVs for monitors so I’m stuck with HDMI anyway.
Both can do 4K 480Hz

[Troll]

Originally posted by _I_:

why are you comparing them?
at any given time, dp/dvi-d have been ahead of hdmi

dp > dvi-d > hdmi -> dvi-a = vga

Because hdmi 2.2 will have more bandwidth than dp 2.1b

[Troll]

Originally posted by C1REX:

I personally don’t see much difference. I use gaming TVs for monitors so I’m stuck with HDMI anyway.
Both can do 4K 480Hz

Same here

[404NotFound]

Originally posted by Troll:

Originally posted by C1REX:

I personally don’t see much difference. I use gaming TVs for monitors so I’m stuck with HDMI anyway.
Both can do 4K 480Hz

Same here

Originally posted by C1REX:

I personally don’t see much difference. I use gaming TVs for monitors so I’m stuck with HDMI anyway.
Both can do 4K 480Hz

yeah me too, as long as you have an HDMI cable that can handle the bandwidth.

[404NotFound]

Originally posted by Tiberius:

Hdmi has better audio/arc support and cec. Tbh, i'd pick hdmi over dp these days. Dp bandwidth is overkill and 99% of the users prolly nvr use most of it.

Thunderbolt is even better, but it's stupidly more expensive than dp or hdmi

Thunderbolt 5 80-120Gbps
HDMI 2.2 96Gbps
DP 2.1b 80Gbps