Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Give it 3 years and they won't be making any gaming cards because there's no meaningful profit to be made.
The problem with gaming GPUs is that it takes away limited allocated silicone from AI and other more profitable options.
TSMC in Taiwan having basically a monopoly for all gaming GPU manufacturing is a problem.
That's not 7% profit... That's 7% revenue
Their profit margin is probably half that.
Yes but every gpu is silicon that could have been an AI accelerator instead at much highe rprofits, the allocation of fabs is very limited.
Nvidia made $40billion of revenue this quarter. 7% of that ($2.8billion) was from gaming GPUs. Of that $2.8billion revenue, Usually profit margins are around 30%. So 30% of $2.8b = $840million.
To me and you that sounds like a lot of money, but to a multi trillion dollar company it's pennies. And it's not like it's free money, they have to dedicate resources, people and time into churning out newer more powerful graphics cards.
And what does Nvidia get in return? Pennies worth of profit and a heap load of unhappy customers... If they diverted the time and people they spent on gaming GPUs into their data centre GPU / AI department it would probably be better value for money.
I could be wrong but there's a reason Nvidia no longer gives a damn about the gaming GPU market. It's simply an afterthought for them now.
Nvidia is not going anywhere. They will keep making cards because they have a stable market share anyway and it is an income.
Anyway, the average consumer always eat the worse silicon anyway, tnx to binning the processors.
Btw does it mean they should stop these departaments too?
- Professional Visualization (Workstation GPUs) 511M
- Automotive and Robotics 517M
2.8 billion in profits is a lot of money, even if comparably it's not as much as they currently have. Anyone who would ignore that is a fool.
"We made so much money that making more money than most other companies just isn't worth it anymore."
No company would say "I'd rather make no money than some money." In this case, "some money" for Nvidia just happens to be billions and billions of dollars.
Also there is a silver lining to everything. Many players are happy seeing huge progress each GPU generation but others would love a GPU stagnation and no need to upgrade for longer periods.
Nvidia lost like, 600 billion dollars in value recently just because some competition showed up in the A.I. space. Sure they recovered in short order, but that really has to serve as a wakeup call. A diversified portfolio of products is a safer bet.
Also, you're basically saying is that they just want to throw away 7% of their profits for nothing. That's not how business works. They need to gain something of greater value by shedding the gaming department for that to be a worthwhile option.
Maybe if they could reallocate their gaming resources into something more profitable that'd make sense, but if their G.P.U. dept. is doing a good job, and you can't really do anything else with them then the status quo continues.
Heck, most of Intel's profits don't come from G.P.Us. either but they are making the Arc cards. Intel just entered this market, and experienced at least enough success in it to make Battlemage cards.
Something else to be noted is that most of Nvidia's brand name recognition is tied into their history as a graphics card company.
70% of Disney's operating income come from the theme parks[www.forbes.com], but they still make movies, and they even expanded into buying the entertainment media library of other countries to launch Disney+ Streaming. services.
What you're proposing is something akin to Disney stops making movies because their theme parks make most of the money. Seems pretty unlikely to me, especially since many of their recent movies have been box-office flops and they still haven't shuttered down the animation studios.
That makes some amount of sense, but using that logic Taiwan Semiconductor might as well just stop making low end end consumer chips altogether. Market saturation has to be taken into consideration too.
“Fourth-quarter Gaming revenue was $2.5 billion, down 22% from the previous quarter and down 11% from a year ago. Full-year revenue rose 9% to $11.4 billion.”
https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2025
AMD released…
“ Gaming segment revenue in the quarter was $563 million, down 59% year-over-year, primarily due to a decrease in semi-custom revenue.
For 2024, Gaming segment revenue was $2.6 billion, down 58% compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in semi-custom revenue.”
https://ir.amd.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1236/amd-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-financial
I haven’t read what Intel are reporting… big figures I guess if this is Nvidia’s gaming arm ‘literal death’
Edit: Intel don’t even segment it out but for the entire business…
“ Fourth-quarter revenue was $14.3 billion, down 7% year-over-year (YoY). Full-year revenue was $53.1 billion, down 2% YoY.”
https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1726/intel-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-financial
Nvidia are so far ahead! It grew overall when the others shrank.
People want cheaper graphics cards but with your statement i don't see that happening.
They need to make their gpu's cheaper so they can make more profit and still sell the cards cheaper.
I guess it's a balancing act.