Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
They also have a 'PC builder' widget.
Personally I would never build a "new" PC. Complete waste of $.
I want my PC to be able to run "ANY" OS. Not a limited PC. This takes knowing OS's and hardware and what allows what?
I suggest getting 6th - 7th gen i7 INTEL refurb rig. They have 8 cores, all you really need! And DX12 ABUSE is not forced on these older rigs, Which is why so many have so many issues running older games on 10-11 on systems with 12-40 cores = rediculous!
As for GPU's I gave up testing "Gefarce" = too many issues. I prefer AMD GPU's = STABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I use old 2020 drivers for windows 7 and 2022 Drivers for windows 11.
Stay away from ASUS. I have replaced more ASUS hardware than any other- JUNK!
So would one of those memory sticks be enough?
Which thermalright cpu cooler would you recommend?
Scorptec I did look online when I was interested a custom build. But since I love my computer currently and need to upgrade it. Looking at the parts. Although many people recommend the hellhound graphics card over sapphire.
4080 is better than XTX let alone the XT.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/gpu-test-system-update-for-2025/2.html
any memory set with EXPO and remember you want 2 sticks not 1 or 4......
as for the coolers any of the thermalrights would work.....
and most people are right.....a base level 7900XT will beat a 4080 most days of the week when not accounting for anything ray tracing.....
I would personally recommend OP 4070 TI super For a mix of productivity, gaming (like streaming/ rendering videos) and ray tracing performance due it being a NVIDIA card or you can just get a 7900XT just purely for gaming. Considering you just want a gaming PC 7900XT is more than enough for you for what games you want to play.
OR
If you do more productivity considering the system you have in your PCpartpicker list, then a 4080 will help you more than enough.
I am not sure about the motherboard, im not educated enough knowing DDR5 Motherboards yet....
...There is so much wrong with this.
There's no such thing as a "limited" PC in terms of what operating system it can run. All of these brands run fine on Linux.
Intel was limited up to 4 cores on the mainstream consumer sockets (i.e. LGA1151) until 8th generation, which went up to 6, they only went up to 8 cores with the 9th generation. The core performance of those processors are also vastly behind for modern gaming, to advise buying those chips is just laughably terrible advice.
The reason why older games have problems running on Windows 10 and 11 is because of compatibility, not because of core count, dude. It used to be a lot worse if you ran Vista back in the day because a lot of software just had problems with it. No, this isn't a hardware issue, it's an operating system issue that's more or less unavoidable, because as software changes with time, older software that doesn't change can end up having issues running on machines with newer software.
A lot of older games (particularly DX9 games) actually run better on Linux and with fewer problems thanks to DXVK, and you can apply that to Windows as well to get more or less the same result, makes a huge difference because DirectX by itself is awful.
GeForce GPUs aren't less stable than Radeon GPUs, it's the other way around. NVIDIA has fewer RMAs than AMD on average, and it's not a small margin either, the majority of buyers are going with NVIDIA (at least over 80%) but they still have fewer RMAs, and considering that AMD sells less than 15% of total GPU sales worldwide, that's pretty freaking bad.
AMD's drivers also aren't notorious for no reason, their drivers are factually just not as stable and prone to issues which drove a lot of users away because they couldn't escape the problems because AMD wasn't fixing them. Friends of mine bit the bullet and returned or sold their 7900-XTXs to get 4080s and 4090s because they kept ending up with bad cards that had defects, ran too hot and overheated often out of the box, or just had issues performing consistently, and I had some of these same issues YEARS ago with the RX 5700-XT, it ran ridiculously hot so the fans had to be ramped up constantly while gaming and the AORUS cooler was absurdly loud above 50%, and over 66% it literally started to cause the computer case to vibrate. RX 400 and 500 series also had a really high failure rate because they were popular with cryptominers, which only exposes how bad the quality has been for awhile, they've definitely improved their quality a bit since then but they still have much to work on.
Running older drivers is only going to hurt performance, more so on AMD as they're always increasing performance with newer driver versions.
My next build I will have a bracket support for the graphics card.
Sadly now the 4080 and 90 in particular still have problems and I just don’t want the drama of a graphics card catching fire because off NVidia
The fact that you got a joker award speaks volumes on the brainwashing that the tech industry is capable of on these forums. I absolutely agree, new hardware is less versatile.