Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It is somewhat alive.
5080/5090 are still much more advanced than 40 series, just not in the way most people would have preferred.
They shrunk the pcb’s significantly which is impressive although most people don’t care.
That can also skew data because how software is written might favour one change in architecture over another, and in some cases when instructions are removed or disabled (for various reasons including security flaws) it can lead to negative performance or a smaller uplift than expected.
This sometimes happens right before a release of a hardware and isn't reported and leads to less performance than expected v. the claimed performance. Most flaws in chips that are hardware-level like that are not disclosed for 12 months or more after launch because it takes time to assess whether there are more.